Tesla uberbulls often like to say that Tesla is the leader in self-driving because while it doesn’t have a commercially available autonomous ride-hailing service like Waymo, it doesn’t rely on geo-fencing and mapping like Waymo.

They argue that if Tesla wanted to do that it could, but it prefers to focus on an autonomous system that could drive anywhere, anytime, without mapping.

However, it is questionable that they could do it if they wanted to because they still haven’t done it on a project much simpler than Waymo’s operations in Pheonix and other cities: the tunnels under Las Vegas.

The Las Vegas Convention Center Loop is The Boring Company’s first full-scale loop project currently in commercial use.

Elon Musk’s tunneling start-up completed the $50 million project in just over a year.

A Boring Company Loop system consists of tunnels in which Tesla electric vehicles travel at high speeds between stations to transport people within a city. The Boring Company said that it was working with Tesla to use its self-driving system inside those tunnels, which would enables to get rid of the current drivers and lower the cost of operation.

However, 2 years and several more tunnels connected to the Loop later, The Boring Company is still using drivers in the tunnels.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The last paragraph sums up my own thoughts pretty well

    It doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence in Tesla FSD if they can’t get it to work single-direction, zero-traffic, no weather, zero-obstruction fixed-route. It’s quite literally the easiest use case possible.

    Why hasn’t this problem been solved yet?

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why hasn’t this problem been solved yet?

      Because it’s not an easy problem to solve.

      The issue is that morons like Elon want people to believe that it is.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll be the first to acknowledge that I’m a moron on this and many other topics but…

        This is an environment that doesnt include weather, pedestrians, many other cars, or other obstacles. I feel like my 4 year old Honda could almost manage that. It can follow a lane at a set speed without me actually driving. It can’t manage obstacles or signs or anything like that so it clearly isn’t self driving and I’m not claiming it is. The only hard part would be the intersection between two tunnels but I feel like that part has already pretty much been addressed by Tesla FSD tech.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Part of the problem is to meet their quoted throughput of passengers they would need to fully load/unload each vehicle in ~30 seconds. 4 adults in, 4 out, with luggage, with no delays or struggling. That’s… not very feasible for a commercial passenger car. They’re not designed for quick loading and unloading.

          The tunnels are a single lane without a service tunnel, which the Victorians used in the 1800s for their subways. Because if a single car has mechanical issues the entire service has to stop and empty to clear it. They’re electric, so there are less mechanical systems, but they are still putting a significant amount of wear and tear on tires/axels/steering systems, all the mechanical systems they still have. Even without meeting the their goal throughput, they’re putting orders of magnitude more use on each vehicle, which are consumer cars. They’re meant to spend most of their lives parked.

          If they made a “Tesla train/trolly” where the engine car was pulling a simple enclosed cart with seats it would significantly improve their throughput and loading times, and require less maintenance per passenger. But at that point you’ve just invented a train that uses significantly less efficient rubber tires on asphalt.

    • Dultas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Might have something to do with Musk’s insistence on not using LIDAR. The cameras probably struggle with the lack of distinct / unique features in the tunnels.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s what I’m thinking. It’s probably some obstacle created by management, not a technical issue.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let’s not pretend waymo is doing well either. Haven’t they caused quite a few accidents in San Francisco?

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The waymos are doing well in SF. I like them way more than Ubers, they drive safer / actually obey traffic laws and speed limits. You also can choose your own music and the interiors are always nice.