• phx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, what is the relation of “a speaker” to religion? If somebody comes in to speak and starts talking about how we need to gas more jews, stop women from voting, and put the blacks back out in the cotton fields then fuck yeah I’m gonna support cutting them off and sending them packing.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The topic here is censoriousness. The relationship between a speaker and religion here is via censoriousness, and the reason for that is listed in the first sentence.

      • phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        And? You could take the same data and say- “religious persons are less likely to speak out againstmessaging that potentially promotes harm” (likely also dependent on the religious affiliation of the messenger)

        The preceding message that this makes atheists the more “intolerant” group is a pretty massive reach, consider that the messaging they may be against could in itself be one of intolerance as per my example.