• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    The topic here is censoriousness. The relationship between a speaker and religion here is via censoriousness, and the reason for that is listed in the first sentence.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      And? You could take the same data and say- “religious persons are less likely to speak out againstmessaging that potentially promotes harm” (likely also dependent on the religious affiliation of the messenger)

      The preceding message that this makes atheists the more “intolerant” group is a pretty massive reach, consider that the messaging they may be against could in itself be one of intolerance as per my example.