Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    1:1 stateless NAT is useful for static IPs. Since all your addresses are otherwise global, if you need to switch providers or give up your /64, then you’ll need to re-address your static addresses. Instead, you can give your machines static private IPs, and just translate the prefix when going through NAT. It’s a lot less horrible than IPv4 NAT since there’s no connection tracking needed.

    This is something I probably should have done setting up my home Kubernetes cluster. My current IPv6 prefix is from Hurricane Electric, and if my ISP ever gives me a real IPv6 prefix, I will have to delete the entire cluster and recreate it with the new prefix.

    • Thiakil@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      It should only be needed if your ISP is brain-dead and only gives you a /64 instead of what they should be doing and also giving you a /56 or /48 with prefix delegation (I.e it should be getting both a 64 for the wan interface, and a delegation for routing)

      You router should be using that prefix and sticking just a /64 on the lan interface which it advertises appropriately (and you can route the others as you please)

      Internal ipv6 should be using site-local ipv6, and if they have internet access they would have both addresses.

      • LaggyKar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        64 for the wan interface

        Nitpicking, but the address for the wan interface wouldn’t have a prefix, so the host would just set it as a /128 (point-to-point)

        • Thiakil@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ehh, I’ve seen both. Perhaps not in a home router context though, never really bothered to check

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Hurricane Electric gives me a /48.

        Site-local ipv6 would work here as well, true. But then my containers wouldnt have internet access. Kubernetes containers use Ipam with a single subnet, they can’t use SLAAC.

        • Thiakil@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Point is, you should be able to have them have both. Or stick a reverse proxy in front that can translate. Unless they’re somehow meant to be directly internet reachable the public addresses could be autogenerated

          Full disclosure though I don’t know anything about kubernetes.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, I wonder if there’s any proposals to allow for multiple IPV6 addresses in Kubernetes, it would be a much better solution than NAT.

            As far as I know, it’s currently not possible. Every container/Pod receives a single IPv4 and/or IPv6 address on creation from the networking driver.

      • Thiakil@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        And if you want static ips either use dhcp6 or disable the randomisation of eui64 addresses

        • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I have static IPs for my Kubernetes nodes, and I actually use DHCPv6 for dynamic dns so I can reach any device with a hostname, even though most of my devices don’t have static IPs.

          The issue is those static IPs are tied to my current ISP, preventing me from changing ISPs without deleting my entire Kubernetes cluster.

      • danA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        My ISP does this right (provides a /56 for routing), but unfortunately both are dynamic and change periodically. Every time I disconnect and reconnect from the internet, I get a different prefix.

        I ended up needing to have ULAs for devices where I need to know the IPv6 address on my network (e.g. my internal DNS servers).

        • Thiakil@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Indeed, that’s correct ula usage, but shouldn’t need nat rewriting. The global prefixes just need to be advertised by RA packets

          • Thiakil@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I use openwrt on my home network which uses dnsmasq for dhcp. It can give a static suffix which just works with the global prefix on the interface and the site local / ula prefix it uses

            • danA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Note that Android doesn’t support DHCPv6, just in case you have Android devices and ever have to debug IPv6 on them.

          • danA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yeah I’m not using NAT, sorry for the confusion.

            My router doesn’t support RAs for a ULA range though, so I’m running radvd on my home server.