Well, at least they aren’t outright throwing the functionality in the trash.

  • five82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not defending Google but I think the change is just an admission that the old “Chromecast” branding is outdated. It wouldn’t surprise me if less than 5% of users still regularly cast from a desktop browser.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I would do it more often, if firefox would fucking finally add it into the browser.

      And no, that weird plugin doesn’t count. It’s buggy as hell

      It’s literally the only reason I have chrome installed

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How? It’s closed sourced tech. Not like Firefox can just add it, they would have to pay Google for it (and that’s assuming google would license Firefox for this and remove a competitive advantage from Chrome Browser)

      • prograhammingdev@lemmy.prograhamming.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Pretty sure they can’t bundle it. AFAIK the libraries required for it ship with Chrome / Android and it’s not an open standard. The hacky weird workarounds are people brute forcing it.