• Saff@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hopefully it less hormonal side affects than the female pill. But yeah having an extra level of protection will be nice.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Extra Level”? It’s more about taking the burden off the women for me. Why do they, and only they, always have to mess up their bodies?

        • Saff@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Obviously it depends on the relationship and how risk averse you both are. But yeah why not both? Seems like a pretty good way to be really sure!

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              They’re 100% effective, the only reason there said to be 99% effective is to prevent lawsuits from people using then incorrectly.

              • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m a human, I can make mistakes in the heat of the moment. I’ve had friend couples I know get pregnant even though they’re “professional condom putters onners”.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s not the condom’s fault if you make a mistake. Condom material doesn’t let sperm through, it’s that simple, it’s been used incorrectly if it did. Companies don’t want to lose time and money with lawsuits hence 99%.

                  Also, anecdotal evidence while you weren’t in bed with them isn’t much of a proof, it’s as valid as me telling you I’ve never got any girl pregnant even when we weren’t using any protection therefore pulling out is 100% effective.

        • AEsheron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The hippocratic oath, in this case. Medicine is all about risk management, the worse the “disease,” the more tolerant we are of side effects for the cure. Pregnancy and birth are still pretty traumatic events that, while much safer than they used to be, are still dangerous. Female BC just has to be less risky than that. Male BC on the other hand, has to be as low the risk for a man impregnating a woman, which is to say, almost zero. Pretty much any negative side effect is worse than that, so it’s very difficult to pass. I would gladly take one with comparable side effects to female BC, but sometimes unflinching ethics are inconvenient. Better than the alternative, but still.

          • Norgur@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The Hippocratic oath is not a thing in most countries and not applicable anyway. If it was, kidney transplants would be done without a doctor present (in the US that is, don’t overestimate your little made up oath ritual internationally)

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          we can finally share the load and mess up everyone because of not affording babies!