• trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    They are taking measures to ensure its not too easy to impersonate other users. Seems like a good idea to me.

    • snownyte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Agreed. I know it must be inconvenient to come across this thing. But people have to realize, it is done for a reason.

      You wouldn’t want anyone to pretend they’re you online and ruining your credibility and reputation.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      66
      ·
      6 months ago

      That certainly does seem to be their goal, but, imo, it’s a bit extreme — especially given the context.

        • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          46
          ·
          6 months ago

          Just the environment where the impersonations are theorized to take place — given the type of people who likely use the service, the ways people interract on the site, what the site is used for… imo, it seems unlikely that changing an “a” to a “4” is going to result in a damaging impersonation.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            51
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s a nigligible inconvenience for a significant increase in security. This sort of situation has happened before where different numbers and symbols are used to pass off as other users in online communities.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    6 months ago

    In Wikimedia projects (and MediaWiki systems in general) you actually have to pay attention to other people’s usernames (when working with histories and in article discussions), and at least in Wikipedia long long time ago there was a lot of trolling/vandalism where people impersonated other users (particularly the admins) and made bunch of sockpuppets with tiny variations in names when they got banned. So this rule makes sense.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s actually really cool that they do that. Reduces the ability of people to scam because they cannot pick intentionally-similar usernames.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Defense against homoglyph attacks is a good thing. I’m sure they haven’t had a big issue, but they have a homoglyph detector and that’s a great idea. More systems should implement a generalized homoglyph detector.

    Kudos to wikibooks

    Kalcifer KaIclfer Kaloifer Кalcifer

    Etc…

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      I tried out.

      All the options you give are allowed, only what OP shows gives the error. While it seems like a good idea, seems the implementation is terrible and only filters out the most obvious ones.