Oooh, I did not know that. TYVM!
The strength of life to face oneself has been made manifest. The persona Carighan has appeared.
Oooh, I did not know that. TYVM!
So long as it’s possible to ban the bot so I don’t see the spam, sure.
deleted by creator
By all modern shithead alt-righters, Skyrim is “ultra woke”: It promotes ultimate equality and the ability to be anything you want to be, and freely become someone else later.
Or maaaaaybe people who use “woke” unironically just lack the brain capacity to comprehend even a game like Skyrim. 🤷
Oh I don’t disagree. When I worked in this stuff we usually snuck in that if you put in valid search query syntax (I think it was all Lucene based) then it got used as is. Was nice for us devs to debug shit.
Of course, anything else for used for a weighted fuzzy everything search, and the customers were always take happy with that (customers being the store owners). 🤷
Do you? Then how come examples like OP’s don’t really specify much.
Is that any keyword? All keywords? Where? Tags? Title? Name? Description? If all, do they all have to appear int he same field(s)? Anywhere? On the whole page including crosssellers?
This is what to mean: it’s easy to say “just search for exactly this!”, but what you intuitively think of as “exactly this” is not intuitive from the perspective of a search index. At all. So it gets preprocessed and changes before being used for a search, and in many cases, widened. Because we humans are very bad at putting in an accurate search such as: name:"60w" and description:"standby"
. We rarely do that.
There’s nothing in it for them, the simple fact is that the virtual all of people does not look for specific terms.
Hence the search is optimised to give you loads of things that relate to some parts of your search at least.
Source: did backend code for shopping frontends for years.
The search is incredibly fuzzy, plus the tag words of products themselves are fuzzy. And usually they don’t allow forcing a hard match search, though you can try + or and
between each word. We had one site that allowed it, just use lucene search syntax.
Not spent much time in it so far, but what I’ve seen (just out of the tutorial parts and a bit into the open area) this is fantastic. Love the change in pace and how much this feels like it could have been a classic game’s remake instead of a new game. They nailed the style perfectly.
It’s as if someone who did the Link’s Awakening remaster also got drunk on Solomon’s Key!
Since he shifted his tactical arsewipes and rebranded vitamin pills business to officially be his dad’s now, I dunno.
Maybe as a domain-squatting thing? Make infowars be the official website of Knowledge Fight? Or a campaign website to fight christian extremism.
Damn, that’s a good building expression of the shit I see at work coding software. 😅
What am I looking at here? Something on a roof?
Nice try, FBI!
Both. I use YT on Firefox constantly, and I just explicitly tried again with a swapped user agent, and there’s no issues at all, works perfectly as expected. I saw from your other reply that you use a fairly involved and heavily modifying expansion, not just a user agent switcher.
If you try to “harden” your FF, always keep in mind that a large portion of that means absolutely breaking things left and right and center. It might work, but always expect it will not. Because it’s just not something anybody would ever test for when creating web pages. So you’re running essentially unknown scenarios. It might be interesting input to the extension-author that this breaks, though. It might be something they think they got working. Of course, it could also be that it’s “Yeah that happens, it’s intentional”. But might as well report it to them.
Yeah I don’t know how this is in other countries but over here that can seriously damage your case as the other party can claim your motivation is fame (and hence money), not justice. You generally never do this, and it’s one of the things lawyers are very serious and strict about.
Yeah especially if you look on reddit, it’s a handful of accounts with a very concerted effort.
Don’t get me wrong it’s shitty behaviour, but it’s also fairly obviously some are getting paid to suddenly do this.
So you don’t use Firefox, you mess with Firefox. That’s on you then. Devs can’t be held responsible for you intentionally breaking things. Only do what you know works.
It works fine?
Yeah, we were also once happy.
And then we started using Jira.
RIP
And as for the two that did not showed up. It’s a good practice to reconfirm the night before. Sometimes people forget. Sometimes life gets in the way.
It’s why for board gaming, nowadays we plan on this weird mix of snacks: Most is just bagged stuff so we can always not open bags, and the little fresh stuff that there is - usually one guy who loves to bake - is not done just for that evening, he makes a whole lot, brings some to board gaming and the rest goes to colleagues in the office.
And if we know before hand that nobody has eaten but we all want a major meal, we’ll order something and in turn plan for even less snacks.
Anyone got any good resource on how to get started developing addons from scratch?
Are there Jetbrains plugins or something to streamline the process?