According to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs say they are lactose intolerant, and it is medically necessary for them to avoid milk.
  • Boozilla@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    8 months ago

    I despise Starbucks, but I’m not sure this lawsuit makes any sense. Those non-cow milks costs them more. Of course, the law often doesn’t make sense, anyway.

    As another commenter said, they could just overcharge for cow milk and make the prices all the same. Then nobody is happy, but it meets the legal requirement (as I understand it).

    • _number8_@lemmy.worldEnglish
      01·
      8 months ago

      Those non-cow milks costs them more.

      so? it’s starbucks. they’ll be fine.