A new bill, the first of its kind in the U.S., would ban security screening company Clear from operating at California airports as lawmakers take aim at companies that let consumers pay to pass through security ahead of other travelers.

Sen. Josh Newman, a California Democrat and the sponsor of the legislation, said Clear effectively lets wealthier people skip in front of passengers who have been waiting to be screened by Transportation Security Administration agents.

“It’s a basic equity issue when you see people subscribed to a concierge service being escorted in front of people who have waited a long time to get to the front of TSA line,” Newman told CBS MoneyWatch. “Everyone is beaten down by the travel experience, and if Clear escorts a customer in front of you and tells TSA, ‘Sorry, I have someone better,’ it’s really frustrating.”

If passed, the bill would bar Clear, a private security clearance company founded in 2010, from airports in California. Clear charges members $189 per year to verify passengers’ identities at airports and escort them through security, allowing them to bypass TSA checkpoints. The service is in use at roughly 50 airports across the U.S., as well as at dozens of sports stadiums and other venues.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why do people use Clear? What am I missing?

    As long as there are fewer Clear customers, they can essentially jump ahead of the folks in line for TSA Pre. For folks that travel on airplanes as a living, every moment counts, and they’re willing to spend whatever to cut out delays. Further, some concierge services and high end credit cards offer Clear subscriptions included. Others are business travelers and just charge their Clear subscription to their business expenses.

    Its certainly not worth it to me, and I’ve never been a Clear customer.