Today’s young people have endured crisis after crisis—social media upheaval, a pandemic, and political turmoil. And for many eager to finally start their careers, they’re facing yet another uphill battle: entering one of the toughest job markets in a decade.

Job postings are down, and unemployment among recent graduates has climbed to 9.3%, according to the Federal Reserve—its highest level outside of the pandemic since 2014.

But one lawmaker says this may only be the beginning.

Unemployment for recent college graduates could surge to as high as 25% in the next two to three years, warned U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.) in an interview with Bloomberg, and it could cause a “level of social disruption that’s unprecedented.”

“If we eliminate that front end of the pipeline, how are people ever going to get to that mid-career spot?” Warner added to CNBC.

  • Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I know, I just take (very very slight) issue with your choice of “can’t” rather than “won’t”

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      46 minutes ago

      Haha, I see. You’re right. I used to reason in accurate logical terms about this, and “won’t” is the correct one from logical standpoint. Lately I don’t do that anymore. Reason being that people who don’t have this framework in their minds, about the system pressures and such, hear the “won’t” and assign it a typical level of agency. In most situations when someone won’t do something that they can do, there’s a higher probability they can go from won’t to would. So they feel like these actors in this system have a significantly higher propensity of doing the other thing than they actually do. If only Zuckerberg heard this or that argument, he’d see the light and stop being a piece of shit. If only he read that book, he’d stop fighting regulation. But that’s not how it works and it’s not about this or that individual. It’s an aggregate action that makes most actors act to further interests opposed to ours. So these days I use “can’t” to express how unlikely it is for the ruling class to do the other thing, even if it’s not logically accurate. Cause a lot of people aren’t looking at the system this way at all.

      E: I think when working people grasp the near-impossibility of the ruling class going significantly against their own interest, they (working people) start seeing through the ruling class propaganda and begin reaching for the real solutions.

      • Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        Super fair, I’m neurodivergent (though generally mask very well) and tend to notice small details like that (while forgetting that my perspective is often in the minority in that regard)