JPlus is fully compatible with Java, offering modern language features like null safety, boilerplate code generation and other modern language features to reduce developer burden and maximize productivity.
Notably, there is currently no ‘superset’ language that keeps Java syntax almost intact while extending the language with features like null checks at the language level. JPlus aims to fill this gap, providing a language that existing Java developers can naturally learn and adopt.
Isn’t kotlin a better option?
Kotlin isn’t a superset, you can’t just compile a java file with kotlin and have it work afaik. That seems to be the point here.
This is more like a preprocessor anyway, like SASS to CSS. The compiler spits out Java source code, not jvm bytecode.
Exactly, as you said, Kotlin isn’t a Java superset. you can’t just compile a Java file with Kotlin and have it work. JPlus works similarly in that it outputs standard Java source code rather than JVM bytecode.
However, JPlus is not merely a “preprocessor.” It actually parses Java source like a compiler, performs null-safety checks and boilerplate code generation on the generated parse tree, and finally produces standard Java code. In that sense, JPlus should be considered a compiler. The only difference is that its output is Java code; if the code generation step were extended to produce JVM bytecode directly, it could bypass the Java source entirely and generate bytecode straightaway.
The key point is that, just like TypeScript addresses JavaScript’s lack of type safety, JPlus fills in some of Java’s gaps. It allows you to keep almost all of your existing Java code while adding features like null-safety and automatic boilerplate generation, improving both safety and developer convenience.
A preprocessor is basically a compiler which produces input for another compiler. Yes, it’s a compiler. The difference is that it produces source files, not bytecode.
From Wikipedia:
The emphasis is mine.
Both Typescript and SASS are examples of preprocessors.
By that logic, the C compiler would also be a preprocessor since it converts C code into assembly. Simply calling something a preprocessor just because its output is source code is not logically correct. The same applies to JPlus: the fact that it ultimately produces Java source code does not make it a preprocessor. Internally, it performs compiler-level processes such as AST generation, null-safety checks, and boilerplate code generation, so it should be regarded as a proper compiler.
The C Preprocessor also does all of those things. That’s expected of a preprocessor. If you say “you can write java code with a bit of extra sugar and JPlus turns it back into ‘regular’ java,” then that’s a preprocessor.
A simple preprocessor only performs code transformation and cannot analyze the meaning of the code or ensure type safety. However, JPlus goes beyond mere transformation by providing static analysis capabilities, such as generating a parse tree and checking nullability. It also includes functionality to automatically generate necessary Java code through the apply syntax. As a result, the combination of performing nullability static analysis and generating code via apply cannot be expressed or handled using any existing Java syntax alone.
Kotlin is great for null-safety, but JPlus allows you to enforce null-safety without rewriting your existing Java code, which can be easier for teams working in legacy projects or who prefer staying in pure Java.
AFAIK Kotlin and Java code can co-exist as source level. Never tried it though. I guess it depends on the end case scenario what to use.
JPlus retains almost all of Java’s syntax while providing conveniences like null checks, allowing Java developers to use it immediately without additional learning. In contrast, Kotlin can utilize Java classes but requires learning Kotlin syntax and its libraries, and it cannot use Java syntax directly or automatically guarantee null safety. Therefore, JPlus offers a distinct advantage over Kotlin.
You can probably adopt both for a large existing project. Old files get compiled with JPlus, new files will be written in Kotlin. Old files can also gradually be ported to kotlin.
Exactly, that could work. You can keep the existing files as they are and compile them with JPlus, while writing new modules in Kotlin to adopt it gradually. JPlus can serve as a stepping stone before moving fully to Kotlin. However, converting all Java code in an existing project to Kotlin would not only carry significant risks but also be costly. With JPlus, you can fully leverage the proven existing Java codes.