JPlus is fully compatible with Java, offering modern language features like null safety, boilerplate code generation and other modern language features to reduce developer burden and maximize productivity.

Notably, there is currently no ‘superset’ language that keeps Java syntax almost intact while extending the language with features like null checks at the language level. JPlus aims to fill this gap, providing a language that existing Java developers can naturally learn and adopt.

  • Pamasich@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    However, JPlus is not merely a “preprocessor.” It actually parses Java source like a compiler, performs null-safety checks and boilerplate code generation on the generated parse tree, and finally produces standard Java code. In that sense, JPlus should be considered a compiler. The only difference is that its output is Java code

    A preprocessor is basically a compiler which produces input for another compiler. Yes, it’s a compiler. The difference is that it produces source files, not bytecode.

    From Wikipedia:

    In computer science, a preprocessor (or precompiler)[1] is a program that processes its input data to produce output that is used as input in another program. […], which is often used by some subsequent programs like compilers.

    The emphasis is mine.

    Both Typescript and SASS are examples of preprocessors.

    • JPlus@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      From Wikipedia:

      In computer science, a preprocessor (or precompiler)[1] is a program that processes its input data to produce output that is used as input in another program. […], which is often used by some subsequent programs like compilers.

      The emphasis is mine.

      Both Typescript and SASS are examples of preprocessors.

      By that logic, the C compiler would also be a preprocessor since it converts C code into assembly. Simply calling something a preprocessor just because its output is source code is not logically correct. The same applies to JPlus: the fact that it ultimately produces Java source code does not make it a preprocessor. Internally, it performs compiler-level processes such as AST generation, null-safety checks, and boilerplate code generation, so it should be regarded as a proper compiler.

      • AbelianGrape@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The C Preprocessor also does all of those things. That’s expected of a preprocessor. If you say “you can write java code with a bit of extra sugar and JPlus turns it back into ‘regular’ java,” then that’s a preprocessor.

        • JPlus@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The C Preprocessor also does all of those things. That’s expected of a preprocessor. If you say “you can write java code with a bit of extra sugar and JPlus turns it back into ‘regular’ java,” then that’s a preprocessor.

          A simple preprocessor only performs code transformation and cannot analyze the meaning of the code or ensure type safety. However, JPlus goes beyond mere transformation by providing static analysis capabilities, such as generating a parse tree and checking nullability. It also includes functionality to automatically generate necessary Java code through the apply syntax. As a result, the combination of performing nullability static analysis and generating code via apply cannot be expressed or handled using any existing Java syntax alone.