cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52369691

According to the complaint, Toyota and its hydrogen partner, FirstElement Fuel (True Zero), intentionally concealed evidence of:

  • hydrogen leaks near hot engine components, creating explosion risks

  • sudden power loss, acceleration, and braking failures leading to collisions and injuries

  • a collapsing hydrogen infrastructure, leaving drivers stranded for weeks without access to fuel

  • aggressive financial collection tactics by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, targeting owners of inoperable vehicles.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s still room for hydrogen aviation,

    Is there really? I read the tanks make it impractical and that synthetic hydrocarbon jet fuel would be the likely fossil fuel replacement.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      A number of major aerospace companies are working on the concept, so I wouldn’t say it’s not feasible. But the jury is very much still out.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I thinks it’s more that there is no acceptable solution for aviation yet, so yes there’s room

      • batteries will never have sufficient power density
      • plant based fuels are unlikely to scale
      • hydrogen has technical challenges
      • ammonia is dangerous

      Every option has significant limitations but we need something to work

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Solid state batteries may well be dense enough. Admittedly, that is something of a “two years away for the last ten years” problem.

        It’s also a safety issue. Now, the issues with safety in EVs is overblown, but commercial aviation has much tighter safety standards. Fortunately, solid state batteries fix that, too.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Airplane fuel is dangerous and full of lead. Every time people list disadvantages of alternative technologies, they pretend current fuels aren’t a toxic dangerous mess.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Jet fuel doesn’t contain lead and never did.

          AvGas does still have a lead problem and it was commonly used before the jet age, but is now relegated to small general aviation aircraft - a miniscule percentage. If you look at aviation as a whole, leaded gas usage is effectively zero.

          Really the problem comes down to contamination at and near small historical airfields.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You can always find more toxic stuff to worry about but fire fighting foam is independent of fuel toxicity and the concern is not lead

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The other side of this is if there’s a solid state lithium battery breakthrough. That would have both the energy density and safety margins to be usable for even Pacific flights.