What an odd thing to say…

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If a robotic taxi can lower the taxi category of accidents by 91% across the board, including death rates, then that’s a positive improvement to society any way you slice it. Not saying it isn’t a horrifying dystopian world we’re potentially building, but at the moment, given the numbers, it would be 91% safer in that category.

    You need to prove this number. Looking at the behavior of current driverless cars, the software is still shit, and nothing has reached Level 5 Autonomous Driving. There are too many edge cases, and conflicting behavior points. Navigating a world of humans driving in different ways with complex urban and rural streets is a very very messy affair.

    Hell, nobody in the space can even answer this simple question correctly: If the speed limit is 55 MPH on the highway, and everybody is going 65 MPH, and we know that the delta of speed is what kills people in highway car accidents, what speed does the driverless car use?

    (Hint: the correct answer is not 55.)

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      i think people are much worse drivers than you think they are… you just hear about every self driving accident because it’s newsworthy right now

      apparently

      Self-driving cars are more than twice as likely to be involved in an accident compared to human-driven cars, but some studies suggest they are considerably less injurious (and fatal) than human-operated vehicle crashes.

      https://financebuzz.com/self-driving-car-statistics-2025

      not a primary source, but their data seems to be from the NHSTA