Pete Hegseth‘s Defense Department has threatened to revoke press credentials of news organization that do not agree to restrictive new coverage rules — and says it may bar journalists who don’t agree to abide by the rules from physical access to the Pentagon’s grounds. But more than three dozen news orgs have said they are refusing to sign on to the requirements.

On Tuesday, in a joint statement five major TV news outlets — ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News and NBC News — said they were not agreeing to the new rules. The Pentagon has told reporters they must sign an agreement for the new rules by Tuesday or turn in their press passes by Wednesday.

According to the Defense Department’s press office, which outlined the new rules last month, reporters covering the Pentagon must sign a pledge not to obtain or use unauthorized material (even if the information is unclassified). If they do not, they will potentially be barred from the Pentagon.

“Today, we join virtually every other news organization in declining to agree to the Pentagon’s new requirements, which would restrict journalists’ ability to keep the nation and the world informed of important national security issues,” the networks said in the statement. “The policy is without precedent and threatens core journalistic protections. We will continue to cover the U.S. military as each of our organizations has done for many decades, upholding the principles of a free and independent press.”

The five networks join a number of other news orgs that have already said they won’t agree to the new rules being imposed by Hegseth, a former Fox News host. Those include the New York Times, AP, Reuters, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, Politico, NewsNation and the Hill, along with conservative-leaning outlets like Newsmax and the Washington Examiner.

At press time, only one outlet has said it plans to sign on to the new rules announced by the Pentagon, which the Trump administration now calls the “U.S. Department of War”: pro-Trump network One America News Network (OANN).


Here’s the current full list of news outlets that have refused to sign the Pentagon’s new rules, as compiled by the Washington Post:

ABC News
AL-Monitor
Associated Press
The Atlantic
Aviation Week
Axios
Bloomberg News
Breaking Defense
C4ISRNET
CBS News
CNN
Defense Daily
Defense News
Defense One
The Economist
Federal Times
The Financial Times
Fox News
The Guardian
The Hill
HuffPost
Military Times
MSNBC
NBC News
The New York Times
Newsmax
NewsNation
NPR
PBS NewsHour
Politico
RealClearPolitics
Reuters
Task & Purpose
The Wall Street Journal
The Washington Examiner
The Washington Post
The Washington Times
WTOP

My original post of this article to World News on lemmy.world, with ~200 upvotes in ~6 hours, good deal of comments, was locked and removed with reason “Internal US News”, at midnight my local time…

https://lemmy.world/post/37359472

(removed)

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/55525545

(my local instance’s mirror of it)

… apparently the lemmy.world World News editorial team doesn’t think it rises to the level of generally relevant to the entire world that basically all US media outlets (with the single exception of OAN, the most MAGA-culty news outlet) are unifying in a collective refusal to comply with the Trump Admin’s new military reporting standards.

No other World/Global News comm on any other instance that I made this same post to acted similarly.

So, in the interest of promoting public awareness, here’s the same article, in lemmy.world US News.


EDIT:

If anyone would care for meta-discussion about my last paragraph, not actually from / about the article/story itself, let’s try to funnel that over to:

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/55553071

… so that the discussion here can be more directly on topic.

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    How MAGA-culty is Newsmax? I haven’t heard anything significant about Newsmax or OAN in a while, but I thought they were both equally MAGA. It’s been years since I associated with their viewers since they didn’t get loud about it until 2020. I can’t believe I’m impressed Fox and New smax has declined the agreement.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Basically, Newsmax is more extremely right wing than Fox News, but OAN is even more extremely right wing than Newsmax.

      … As stupid as this is:

      https://www.thedailybeast.com/one-america-news-declares-war-on-newsmax-for-censoring-mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell/

      Yeah.

      Yeah, the literal self professed crack addict MyPillow guy Mike Lindell who went around claiming he had proof of voting fraud in the 2020 election, ended up sued into oblivion by voting machine manufacturers?

      Newsmax wouldn’t let him on, OAN would, US right wingers had a fight over this.

      That… really is a huge part of how OAN defined itself as basically the totally batshit crazy QAnon / Evangelical MAGA news network, vs Newsmax’s… “still pretty darn right wing but not completely angry drunk racist uncle at thanksgiving” level of right wing.