• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Like I said before, you might be 100% right that it was a strawman. But the fact that you keep so forcefully refusing to clarify, makes me think that probably it was not. Feel free to prove me wrong if you would like to.

    You just openly admitted to utilizing a strawman argument and yet you are still demanding I respond to your strawman framing of this argument?

    • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I didn’t intentionally strawman your argument. I read something into your argument that might or might not have been there. You are really aggressively refusing to clarify whether or not it was there (and also by the by, going back and editing your past statements to say something significantly different from what they said when I responded to them), and deflecting to all kinds of stuff instead no matter how many times I ask.

      I think this conversation has run its course. You’re still welcome to clarify “fear mongering,” but it seems unlikely that you’re going to. Best of luck to you in your future endeavors.