• walden@wetshav.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just to be clear because I don’t want anyone to read this and take it as fact…

      Smoke detectors detect smoke by looking for particles.

      Some devices are combo Smoke/Carbon Monoxide (CO) detectors. They cost more but it’s good to have both and it’s easier to have fewer devices.

      You can also get stand alone Carbon Monoxide detectors and absolutely should. It’s odorlesss and very deadly and is produced by burning gas/oil/propane or whatever else you burn to heat your house.

      • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The problem with the combo ones is that CO is heavy and goes the the ground and smoke rises with heat. So CO alarms should be low and smoke alarms high.

        • walden@wetshav.ing
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve quickly skimmed 3 articles on the subject just now, and the consensus is it just mixes evenly with air. It’ll naturally be more concentrated near the source, but there’s tons of air flow in a house especially when the heat is on. One article even said CO is lighter than air (bit not enough to separate and rise on its own).

          • rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I was a little skeptical and just looked at NFPA codes (USA) and they don’t seem to care about placement elevation, only type of rooms and heating sources. I didn’t read all 68 pages, only what seemed relevant, so maybe I missed some discussion.