The German car-maker says its “optional power upgrade” is designed to give customers more choice.

  • Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So basicly it’s excusing either their bad warranty , their bad planning , or their bad quality.

    None of the customers business and shouldn’t be a subscription.

    I means what’s next ? 3 tires the 4th will be a subscription cause it’s one more tire that needs maintenance ?

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There’s a $650 lifetime unlock option. What’s the difference between this and the “m series” for BMW that costs $20k over stock, that must be purchased at the time of order??

      At least gives an option to the user, if it’s not fast enough for winning races at the nurburgring, then they can unlock full performance for $650.

      In city it makes no difference except using more energy and consuming tires faster than expected

      • Evono@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        The difference is , the BMW actually changes something physically.

        The 650 unlock just unlocks something artificially you already had purchased and owned.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Why shouldn’t I break into your house, change the locks, and then charge you a ransom to get access to it back?

        'Cause that’s what VW is doing here.

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’s completely different. It’s a car that was sold with an option at moment of purchase. 145 HP or 200 HP for more money? Normal people chose the 145 HP because cheaper and pay less taxes and insurance and because when you drive in the city the 50 HP do not make any difference.

          Suppose one day the owner needs to win races at the nurburgring instead of commuting or taking kids at school, so they give the option of unlock the full power instead of buying a new car.

          If it was something like “from today you need to pay a subscription if you want to open the back windows” I would agree with you, but in this case it’s a power unlock that was known from the moment of purchase and not a surprise shock.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            No, that’s absolute bullshit.

            In your example, they absolutely and unequivocally bought all 200 HP, from the beginning, and merely got a good deal on it if VW charged a lower price than the identical car with different number on the label. But it was always their property from the beginning because that’s how property works.

            They owe VW nothing after the fact, and always had the capital-r Right to use every bit of horsepower the engine was physically capable of!

            The only reason someone could possibly disagree is if they’re a corporate whore who hates property rights and loves being subjugated. It is not a tenable position for any reasonable person to have.