qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldimagemessage-square190fedilinkarrow-up1932arrow-down131
arrow-up1901arrow-down1imageWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square190fedilink
minus-squareDr. Moose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down2·2 days agoThis is exactly why ipv6 was never widely adopted. There’s too much power in a limited IP pool.
minus-squareDomi@lemmy.secnd.melinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 day agoDefine “widely”. According to Google 46.09% of their traffic is IPv6 and most servers support it. It’s mostly large ISPs dragging their feet.
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 hours agoI’ve never seen functional ipv6 except at university, and I would only consider gci large in terms of coverage area and price.
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoI think it’s just a few domestic US ISPs. The rest of the world has been happily using it for quite some time.
This is exactly why ipv6 was never widely adopted. There’s too much power in a limited IP pool.
Define “widely”.
According to Google 46.09% of their traffic is IPv6 and most servers support it. It’s mostly large ISPs dragging their feet.
I’ve never seen functional ipv6 except at university, and I would only consider gci large in terms of coverage area and price.
I think it’s just a few domestic US ISPs. The rest of the world has been happily using it for quite some time.