• zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Trunk” is nice because it fits with “branch” in the tree metaphor, but “main” does have fewer letters.

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, the metaphor would be good if git was a tree but kt isn’t. It’s very rare to have a real tree branch merge back into the trunk. Would it even still be called a branch after merging?

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s very rare to have a real tree branch merge back into the trunk.

        Not rare, but uncommon. Not sure if there’s a Lemmy equivalent but r/treessuckingonthings shows trunks absorbing all sorts of things including branches

        • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Yes, this is why I chose not to say that it was impossible.

          Perhaps the mathematical definition of a tree is wrong in stating there should be not loops, or should change to another metaphor.

          Hairs can split but never merges back again. Perhaps a split hair instead of a branch? We still trim or prune the leaves ends. What do you call the “trunk” of a hair?

          Edit: formatting

      • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If it’s not a tree, why call it a branch? Maybe branch doesn’t make any sense either. Maybe none of this makes any sense! Oh my God, what are we even doing here?!?! Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!