History shows that if the Dems regain full control, they will not reverse all this carnage 100%. They will reverse maybe 25% of it and pretend the rest isn’t happening and maybe claim they don’t have enough control and we’ll hear the term bipartisan.
That’s why I think we should keep the carnage at 100%
Always astonishing to me that I am either being cut lightly a thousand times or fucking gutted by a fish, and I’m angry about all of it and you all seem to think the mature answer is to be grateful for the light cutting cause it’s “better” by comparison.
“A person can be smart, but people are stupid.”
Most people are complete utter fucking morons about this. Enjoy voting for slower death and somehow finding a smugness in it.
Don’t complain. You said the options were 100% carnage, or 75% carnage, and because there’s no 0% carnage option, you’re happy letting 100% win. What people are trying to explain to you is that you should reduce harm as much as possible, even if you can’t reduce it entirely.
Weird take but ok
Always astonishing to me that I am either being cut lightly a thousand times or fucking gutted by a fish, and I’m angry about all of it and you all seem to think the mature answer is to be grateful for the light cutting cause it’s “better” by comparison.
“A person can be smart, but people are stupid.”
Most people are complete utter fucking morons about this. Enjoy voting for slower death and somehow finding a smugness in it.
Don’t complain. You said the options were 100% carnage, or 75% carnage, and because there’s no 0% carnage option, you’re happy letting 100% win. What people are trying to explain to you is that you should reduce harm as much as possible, even if you can’t reduce it entirely.