The Sapienza computer scientists say Wi-Fi signals offer superior surveillance potential compared to cameras because they’re not affected by light conditions, can penetrate walls and other obstacles, and they’re more privacy-preserving than visual images.

[…] The Rome-based researchers who proposed WhoFi claim their technique makes accurate matches on the public NTU-Fi dataset up to 95.5 percent of the time when the deep neural network uses the transformer encoding architecture.

  • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is cool for home automation if you can turn it into a presence detection software (do not connect your Homeassistant to the internet though)

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      If all you need is presence detection then a motion sensor would be vastly more efficient.

      If you actually need identity detection, then maybe, but you’ll still have to have a camera or detailed access logs to associate the interference signature with a known entity and at that point you may as well just put an RFID reader under the bowl you throw your keys into or use facial or gait detection.

      • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        A motion detector is far more inferior to precense detectors, most just use milimator wave though.