I don’t read my replies

  • 64 Posts
  • 1.34K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • It’s a myth that “anyone can get caught up in a cult”. While it’s true that cults have snared intelligent and sophisticated people, cults exclusively target the emotionally vulnerable. Just like email scammers intentionally use poor spelling and grammar to exclude all but the most credulous, cults have barriers to entry that are going to weed out skeptical people. You often have to dress a certain way; theirs a crazy amount of nomenclature; and strict status and hierarchys to obey. Only the people who have a strong desire to belong and conform are going to tolerate that.

    I don’t say this like oh, I’m too smart to be in a cult. I say it to emphasize that cults prey on vulnerable people.






  • The difference between the two is getting narrower and narrower. Dystopian surveillance and murderous authorities? Check. Imperialist foreign policy built on multiple genocides? Check. Pogroms and oppression of minorities? Not only check, but the US is arguably worse than China or the USSR. Though I admit that may be due to the US having an extra century to do dirt. And don’t forget America’s the world leader in Gulags.

    The idea that America is benevolent is stupid. The idea that she’s benevolent by comparison is running mighty thin.





  • American’s may seem litigious, but many of our legal protections require it. For example, the American Disabilities Act has no enforcement mechanism beyond suing non-compliant businesses. In some states, if you have a homeowners claim, you don’t sue the insurance company, but the individual. This leads to juicy headlines like “Woman sues 6yo nephew over a trip and fall”.








  • IQ is not an objective measure of intelligence. Nothing is. Intelligence is a colloquial and subjective concept like beauty, wit, or BDE. The idea that any of those things can be objectively measured is a logical fallacy. It was developed by eugenicists to do eugenics.

    In his book, the ‘Mismeasure of man’, Gould wrote that he’s often encouraged to compare IQ testing to phrenology. But he says that comparison isn’t fair… to phrenology. We all know that phrenology’s methods are bunk, but it’s theory, that different regions of the brain are responsible for different functions is still mainstream neurology. IQ testing fails in both methodology and theory; phrenology is a superior instrument.

    Any research based on IQ testing is suspect and unreliable.