So, if I were to do a bad re-encode, the result would be copyright-free?
Or not, because I didn’t pass it through AI?

Truly dumb laws.

Scrolling moves the content

Well, what else did you expect it to move?
The kitchen sink?

Don’t ask us, ask AI.

Klearly you are not a KDE Kontributor.

Because it is easier to read large codebases of Python than large codebases of Bash.

Comment

Having had bath with partially filtered sea-water once, I’d rather not.

“Hire”?
No, we will be renting a batch of you.

Well, Babe❤️❤️ specifically said they guessed 3 of the 💍’s, so…

Well, perhaps if they just let me normally use it and transfer data without an internet connection and perhaps supported KDE Connect (considering their price tag), I might have considered buying one instead of just improvising a water resistant cover on a raspberry pi camera.

I think I should start checking if a poster has a history of regularly deleting posts/comments, before trying to give a useful answer.

For some reason, I read that as “15kg ring”.

Although, she might have meant 5k rings. 3 of them. 1 for her, 1 for him and 1 for whomsoever they are going to adulterate with.

There’s ambiguity in the above conversation.

1. The original post tells me that SWF has made the software and is giving it to ACQ; ACQ is asking SG for modification.

2. @litchralee@sh.itjust.works seems to understand it this way: ACQ has made the software and is giving it to SWF and wants SG to do further modifications.

3. The comment that I am replying to, won’t make @litchralee@sh.itjust.works (who is assuming [2.]) realise [1.].

Yeah, that’s right.

But are enough of the AI generation people going to understand the difference?
I feel like, due to the reduction of quality expectations, they will just end up feeling the same about this as we do about the previous one, despite the difference being visible as night and day for us.

Hey, 5 years ago, they couldn’t even solve a HackerRank preliminary coding challenge.

The only problem I see with AI CEOs is that the biggest models will be available to those that already have loads of money, so the adversarial investors get to win.

What’s the problem with the Anthropic one?
Of course everyone wants more W cubes! No?

But hey, at least when you tell them their mistake, they say, “You are absolutely correct!!”

I remember when postman used to bring little envelopes (sometimes little boxes) to people’s homes and was paid by tax money and the small amount of postal fees we paid.

Should have checked the blame before running clang-format himself.

Yeah, I am the same.
I type the code myself, so I know what it actually means, instead of letting AI do it.

It might seem different now, but 10-20 years down the line, they might be the same energy.