

That’s how it should be, not how it is
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg


That’s how it should be, not how it is


I think what they meant is nobody in management cares if someone wants to hold them accountable
Bit it’s a nice picture, yeah


‘Clean Code’ by Uncle Bob is a good place to start when answering these questions.
And here I was, almost agreeing. Clean code is defining quality through aesthetics, and that book is a very bad advice of how to define anything


Tortoise might be fine too


Besides, they say ‘read really old texts’ as if this is easily achieved right now, which it is not


I think, e is silent in baked and not in naked. But that’s kind of like Sean Bean


Yeah, there are maybe a couple of reasonable ideas like using background and making comments stand out more, but that’s it. Especially weird is the idea about light theme not being used because of syntax highlight


Same as many long debunked concepts, sometimes even declared wrong by their own original author, it will continue to have followers and will never completely fade away. For this reason I don’t think that talking about it sometimes is a wrong thing


“Why” comments are of course included in “we don’t need that” category


I think my manager is strongly Clean Code inclined. More than once they removed comments, because they will become outdated anyway (so there’s no use explaining what is going on at all, right? Right‽)


Most of what I know comes from this educational video 🦇


I don’t know much about JS but I managed to get 10/28
More than once I just went with whatever seems unlikely, but not too unlikely to be logical answer. Using this in production seems fitting only for courageous and strong-willed



I was searching for a fitting response and found this, took me long enough to realise it was not a meme, so I decided it kinda fits ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Good catch, it seems like this is


I don’t think much training can be done on 20 pictures


That’s one of the problems with AI images, anything that looks weird is now dismissed as AI even if the photos are century old. A colleague of mine said crabeater seal teeth are definitely AI, for instance.

I created a file with backspace in name, it was hard to understand why filename doesn’t match
The first one is genuinely impressive
I thought it’s just a matter of colour count, but maybe you need more loops? Mine had more loops, I think, and after third colour it passed
I didn’t think it allows diagonal, because it wasn’t the case for me, that’s evil 🌚

Probably not fans of Nintendo or something