

I am left wondering if you mean human-CEO or LLM-CEO here
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg


I am left wondering if you mean human-CEO or LLM-CEO here
I’d guess ‘general populace’ and while I agree to some extent, I don’t think people have no power at all, especially privileged ones
Do you want to say they never let women win justifying that with the fact that women had never won?
That’s just a subject here


I’m guessing, they mean the user of a future that already exists as it is, what you mean is you can implement a future that would provide a way for the code inside to know of being cancelled. But most of the time you don’t do that, and a function that was polled once and then dropped will never know about that


Besides with software industry being pretty big, I think that the crisis may take another 50 years before having an effect they describe, not many of laid off now people will be able to wait for it
They printed on paper to later re-trace the shape on fabric manually


Oh, TIL, thought it’s too random for use by humans


There are also swamp mummies that happened because the swamp may lack oxygen that is needed for proper decomposition. Those are not human-made, of course


Probably not, but I also never seen MM used for millions, usually just M as opposed to k used for thousands


Be the change you want to see
They are just very open to diverse folk
I felt like this was something meta, but thanks for putting it clearly. It is a reasonable observation, but I feel like it’s a bit tangential to tool being a tool and is more about the context luggage that a tool carries
Pičivo.jpg
That one was great 🤣
You got me interested, so I read it. It’s good that the article is so short, it’s bad that there’s no actual argument there
Difference in if that is required and if ‘understanding’ is a quality that a system can have. For instance I feel that a gravity coin sorter is made with understanding but does not have understanding
Yeah, but its author also now demonstrated specific views
e-mail centric even
If anything, not committing the files that should have been committed is something I would expect from a human more often than from an LLM