Yep. Per the article:
But what feels novel in the aftermath of this month’s hurricanes is how the people doing the lying aren’t even trying to hide the provenance of their bullshit. Similarly, those sharing the lies are happy to admit that they do not care whether what they’re pushing is real or not.
I don’t have a great answer other than removing Musk and the rest of the management he put in place, and the only way to impact that as a consumer is to commit to never buying their products.
Unfortunately, the Tesla assembly line is also a wildly racist environment, most likely encouraged by management.
Yeah, the ad dollars all went to Facebook and Instagram, since they’re better-able to deliver the kind of targeting that advertisers want, so most local news stopped being financially viable.
Ideally, would be both. And it likely means getting Congress on board.
There’s a contagion effect, where news of school shootings inspires others to attempt the same.
The current position of the NYPD is that some random black guy wandering past a crime scene after the cops shot up a crowd decided to steal the knife that the cops considered to be key evidence. This is, to put it mildly, somewhat less credible than the claim that a crow tried to steal a murder weapon.
It’s not as fast as I’d like either, but it’s a lot better than the original USPS plan to replace them with diesel trucks.
Or, in this case, not being batty enough.
Yes — also non-native speakers of a language tend to follow similar word choice patterns as LLMs, which creates a whole set of false positives on detection.
“filter out” is an arms race, and watermarking has very real limitations when it comes to textual content.
It doesn’t take people on the internet saying it though; just an association with people saying something and the name, which happens to people who write news articles about something.
There has been a huge spike in BlueSky use, and Lula is now active there.
The NYT really does take Musk at his word even when he’s got a real history of banning accounts for saying true-but-left-wing things.
The bots are not reliable summarizes like that. They often can’t tell the difference between the author and the subject of a piece of writing.
It’s more that Trump read a book:
Edit: I’ll note that this appears to the only time Trump has been observed reading a book.