

Flatmates generally don’t fall over as often as bipedal, top heavy robots.
I ran from Reddit, it be like that
Flatmates generally don’t fall over as often as bipedal, top heavy robots.
You don’t say! I got lucky and got a nice 2nd hand RBMK-1000 at 3.2GW, so brownouts due to high speed shitposting should be a thing of the past.
I am sorry for being late, but I would love to say that the no 0.3Wh vs yes nuclear plant would be just perfect.
Best erotic story ever on !DevsGoneWild@lemmynsfw.com <3
Sorry, i meant the comments under the article on toms hardware. I see this on a every tech site: research says it’s impossible amount of power used, and everyone in the comments below will do half arsed calculations with other made up numbers, trying to disprove the researcher, and always only to defend and legitimise their use of ai.
FWIW I’m not saying that the research here is garbage; it’s a decent attempt estimating by at assuming what you don’t and cannot really know, as long as an OpenAI and their doesn’t publish the data. As far as I know only Mistral published anything at all.
Of course there are comments doubting the accuracy, which by itself is valid, but they are merely doing it to defend AI. IMHO, even at a fifth of the estimates, we’re talking humongous amounts of power, all for a so-so search engine, half arsed chatbots and dubious nsfw images mostly. And let’s not forget: it may be inaccurate and estimates are TOO LOW. Now wouldn’t that be fun?
But the flag still stands so nations can now safely declare to acknowledge and accept the sovereign state of Palestine.
* MICHEL LOTITO HAS ENTERED THE CHAT
The complaints have disappeared at break neck speed.
De fucking wat now?? That is excellent not-the-onion content but hoo boy…
Edit: this article is not exactly for the faint of heart. What a godawful thing to put this guy through.
More climate problems, much more
That’s odd, but truly sorry.
OK kids, one more time. Repeat after me: Cloud is just someone else’s computer.
Yeah, I run dual stack without much trouble myself. I believe it is mainly difficult for people because eyeball diagnostics are impossible with 6.
It’s vulnerable af. And I mean really, it’s as bad as Netscalers or Fortigate shit. Like https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-abuse-ipv6-networking-feature-to-hijack-software-updates/ or https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hackers-abuse-ipv6-networking-feature-to-hijack-software-updates/
Problem is, yes it’s hard to implement but it’s even a lot harder to get it properly secured. Especially because few people are using it, and not securing it is worse than disabling it.
I guess there won’t be any Palestine left, so the whole recognition thing is moot as.
AAAAAAUGGGHHHHH
I live in NL and we’re soaked in roundabouts, but this … this thing, it scares me.
lmao they just cut jobs to pay for their trashy ai.
Hypothetically speaking… ok. But unless someone invents portable anti-grav, bipedal humanoid robots are bad design even in 50 years. They will still be top heavy because of batteries, and electro motors in their limbs with sufficient power, and last but not least a proper heavy head.