To an enormous extent are todays data centers, cloud providers, and all the techology the whole world use today based on open source. Without linux, curl, ffmpeg, and so on nothing in todays high tech society would work. Google, as it is today, would not exist if it was for all the open source they leech of.
Yeah! I forgot about revdep-rebuild! Now that you remind me I do remember being worried about having to rebuild modules, forgetting about it, having to boot frlm live and chroot, and what not going back to Gentoo. I had almsot completely forgotten about it because it is so smooth sailing now.
I started using Gentoo many years ago, and took a break from it for a few years. It has some overhead to maintain. Two years or so ago I went back to it and, no joke, it is so much simpler now. Dist-kernel, dracut, refind just sorted everything. I felt like I was cheating. I don’t have to write my own custom initramfs for my custom needs? Stuff just solves it? And compilation errors and conflicts even when running a bunch of keyworded packages: gone! What is going on?
I hope Sweden and more Erupoean contries does the same
Then migration will take years if they already are established in US cloud services
I never used Windows Vista, but now that that look is back and I’m forced to use mac, I feel like I dodged a bullet and it ricoched back right in my eyes.
Still, huh? Yeah, that is why I stopped using it too.
How does OTR work on it nowadays, or have XMPP moved to some other encryption?
This is such an important thing to learn when using linux. If you want to be able to rescue your setup and not just reinstall: live usb!
To do a rescue on a system that does not boot, then you may also have to enter your environment and fix things, you do that by chroot. I always forget what steps are necessary, so I always look it up in the gentoo handbook: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Full/Installation#Chrooting It is the same principle with any live media.
Look into a distro that you might like, and find a “live usb” of it, often it is the installation media itself. How it works is basically it is a linux already installed on a disk image you transfer to the usb, and tell the computer to boot from it. Instructions on all this usually comes with the live usb media. Then you usually get a “try it out” or “install” option, or it just leaves you at a pre-configured desktop. Click around, install stuff, browse the web, get a feel for it.
Like the chumbawamba song
When
fine societyICE agents sits down to dine
Remember that someone is pissing in the wine
Gives you a shell where you basically are sudo for every command.
What do you mean? This
remoteuser@server$ nc -l -p 4444 > /dev/input/event0
localuser@laptop$ cat /dev/input/event0 | nc server 4444
doesn’t work?
The bum on the rods is hunted down as an enemy of mankind
The other is driven around to his club, is feted, wined and dined
And they who curse the bum on the rods as the essence of all that’s bad
Will greet the other with a willing smile and extend a hand so glad
The bum on the rods is a social flea who gets an occassional bite
The bum on the plush is a social leech, bloodsucking day and night
The bum on the rods is a load so light that his weight we scarcely feel
But it takes the labour of dozens of folks to furnish the other a meal
As long as we sanction the bum on the plush the other will always be there
But rid ourselves of the bum on the plush and the other will dissappear
Then make an intelligent organised kick get rid of the weights that crush
Dont worry about the bum on the rods get rid of the bum on the plush
The sun is in the cloud(s)?
I found this
This manuscript was developed in dialogue with several artificial intelligence system
I guess that is why you say
With this project having escaped my competence long ago
OK. Just to let you know, nothing here makes sense.
Tanke my question. Like on some level, “$g_{rr}$” is the correct answer. But not in the context of the text in the manuscript. Then the answer would be “there is no spatial curvature in that metric, that statement and the section is wrong”.
Your suggested improvements at the end of the comment would not help the situation either. None of them relevantly addresses the issue.
Your answer here makes no sense. For the gravitational lensing calculation you use one metric. Here you try to juggle three metrics at once to… I’m not sure what the intent is, but there are barely anything that makes sense.
Look. If you think that anything here make sense, that you believe that anything that these LLMs your are using is getting closer to some new description of reality, or are even coherent, then I advise you to talk to someone. Like a health professional. What you are doing is not healthy. I’m saying this out of genuine consern.
I will not engage you on this anymore. Just one last thing before I leave, you are not to mention my user name in any contribution nor acknowledgment. Nothing I have said is to be taken as a positive encuragement as to indicate that you are making anything useful here. Hence it would not make sense to make a reference to this conversation as any sort of contribution, as it is not an attempt at contributing but only to critique. So please, do not attribute this to some “community contribution” in any of your texts.
May not be completely on topic… but in your manuscript there you appear to make physics claims. What are those actually? Like you appear to claim to resolve black hole singularities, but there is no substance in the article. Before solving unsolved problem, your theory must reproduce old results, in some way.
An example of common GR exercises you should be able to reproduce is like the gravitational bending of light. Good, you have a chapter on that. However, it contains several errors and appears not to contain references to the claims or derivation of them from your “theory”. Like here is the simplest, first GR lecture stuff, on that section, you write:
The factor of 4 (twice the Newtonian value) comes from the equal contribution of the temporal and spatial curvature in the metric
Can you point to the spatial curvature part of that metric you show there? The one you say contribute an equal factor to the light bending angle.
Then I’d have a lot of follow ups, but it would be helpful to spell out that in this section on light bending is derived from your priciples and what are just suppose to be GR statements.
Do you really see this? In what country? Like most of Sweden may dislike Trump, but more than half wants his politics here; isolationist, racist, nationalist, deregulation, privitization. The party leaders sometimes call out Trump and their dislike for him, and people eat it up and still vote for the same politics. I see nothing changing here.
JBPs guide to mental health