Cakeius

Somebody ACTUALLY on the left wouldn’t use what energy they have trying to shatter any hope of an anti-fascist coalition we have by poo-flinging. Thus, someone who does that must be on the right. Right?

Yes agreed but if you read the whole thing…

There are people in online spaces that just slap the term on ANY opinion.

Want to form a coalition with moderates? Must be transphobic. Refuse to vote Dem because they’re not progressive enough? Must be transphobic.

Bluesky is overrun with them. I’d hoped to find a place here where simply existing wasn’t stigmatized, but these downvotes are telling me maybe Lemmy is overrun too…

It has to do with a phenomenon that is censored in most online spaces, so I’ll spell it out in capitals, aSjUrIbCoIgDaEl, basically if a person being denied care would cause them to off themselves, then denying care is tantamount to manslaughter.

Post-transition people are reportedly much happier than they were pre-transition, but right-wingers find that icky, so they’d rather commit war crimes than allow medicine to go to those who need it.

If you read the rest you’ll discover that the reactionaries don’t care how you vote, they’ll call you that regardless.

I’m taking from the downvotes that there are a lot of people here who got caught up on those first few words and didn’t bother reading the rest or engaging their critical thinking skills…

There’s this huge movement in online spaces lately to bash any and all positions and opinions by calling them transphobic.

Vote right? Transphobic. Vote left? Transphobic. Abstain from voting? Transphobic. Support a company? Transphobic. Boycott a company? Transphobic. Indifferent about a company? Transphobic.

The simplest explanation is a bunch of right-wingers are trying to make the term meaningless. Anyway, nowadays when I hear someone is transphobic, I make sure to wait for solid evidence before changing my opinions.

Y’all got any more o them jpeg

It’s more like ejecting a trespasser.

Imagine if a person broke into your home and you kicked them out, then they died of pneumonia. Their family sues you for killing them. But you didn’t kill them, you just kicked them out.

The person at fault is the person who committed the trespass.

She wouldn’t have to abort if the dick-haver kept it in his pants, would she?

Uh, fruity desserts, peanut butter desserts, caramel and coconut desserts, we’d be ok

Computers that are too new for Windows 7 come with Windows 10 preinstalled on them though. Who would buy an extra copy? You can debloat Windows 10 with a debloater tool

i5

Interstate-5

Do it and then fuck her metamour

Any apparent outrage over anything except fascism is inevitably fabricated in some way, whether by bots or paid shills

Because 100% of the population would never stoop to going unwiped?

Or because those who would already do so?

Hey same. But I would go with sushius.

Correct, but I think what I said would be true in any country.

If their goal is to convince people to not wipe at all, this method will have some non-zero percent of success.

Doesn’t matter, they won’t listen.

Sure.

I find like 99% of people unattractive, though, cis and trans alike.

Mexican and Texas BBQ? Say no more.