• 1 Post
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle
  • It is easy to set a time frame within which the funds are not distributed, and the donator can reclaim them back. I think that in this specific case, it boils down to whether the developer of the smart contract knows what they are doing, and acting in good faith. Fortunately, the opensource nature of smart contract allows anyone to double check the quality of a contract.

    On the other hand, you have a strong point. Not everyone has the time, motivation, and knowledge to check whether a contract has the correct functionalities. The platforms and tools acting as intermediates are rare, not mature enough, and often straight scammy for now.


  • I 100% agree with you. Thank you for sharing a piece of thought that is so often overlooked.
    This is a very tricky world we are in.

    One grievance I have against traditional finances especially, is its inflexibility. Say that you want to fairly share a donation, or even a tip between two individuals.
    With current system, they need to either build their company, or at least be contractors in the same country. One receives the funds, and splits it with the other, by the means of expenses and invoices.
    If they fail to do so, it ends up in court.
    The whole thing takes time and money. And we need to be sure that they are in the same country, bonded by the same laws.

    With cryptocurrencies, someone makes a donation in ETH, and in a matter of minutes, both individuals receive their share with 100% certainty the share has not been modified. Agent A could be in Venezuela for what I care, while agent B is Australian. At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter.
    I concur this is a very specific problem, but one of those reasons why smart contracts shouldn’t be discarded as a whole.



  • I get your point, I agree to some extent.

    I don’t know much about MMO, but given your example of in-game situations, there are cases of moderators/admin treating you unfairly because of a misunderstanding, or because they “don’t like you”. Or other cases where you are locked out of a MMO because you were flagged as an abuser, and you need to jump hoops, to prove yourself, and get your account unfrozen.

    So I would argue that in this case, nothing is bulletproof of “bugs” or “abuse”, and it is not a black or white situation.
    However, it is true that we need a balance between automatic system parsing bazingas of datas everyday, and humans having authority on the outcome, when needed. Harder to know where to draw the line.



  • Yeah and the problem is, the real world kinda doesn’t care. Code gives zero fucks. If I have to be 250% sure the code is correct because no court can fix it if we screw up that’s just not worth it to me

    Fair point, the advantages are not worth the struggle of triple checking everything and ensuring there is no bug.

    I’d rather trust in unbiased humans

    This is my personal opinion, but I disagree on this one. I’d rather choose a well written, unbiased piece of code, over a human that cannot be unbiased.







  • 10ofSwords@sopuli.xyztoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlDeleted
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This a very interesting approach.
    But I wonder if everyone could answer it easily, because of the culture difference, media sources across the world etc.
    An Asian might not guess something about content on US television for example.
    Unless the question relates to a very universal topic, which would more likely be guessed by an AI then…