Work on improving the efficiency of the Haber-Bosch process used in the production of nitrogen just 1%.

is this realistic? we can reduce dairy consumption right now

That will probably have a stronger impact than removing all milk production and private jets from the planet.

“will”, “probably”. we can reduce emissions right now by switching to plant based products, no need to wait for alternatives pop up when climate change is much worse

it’s a combination of things, reduction of consumption and working on reducing the emissions from production of dairy, since there’s some people that will struggle with switching to plant based alternatives due to intolerances, allergies and stuff

most people can reduce or stop consumption of animal based products and there’s no real excuse not to at least work on making some improvements

You could argue vegetable milk is also contributing to killing the planet. Doing that is clearly pointless.

well it’s killing the planet much less and we need some kind of nutrition to live

Is the pollution produced by the production of milk significant, in such a way that reducing it would lead to measurable changes?

is the pollution produced by private jets significant, in such a way that reducing it would lead to measurable changes?

climate change is due to a combination of a lot of things. we need to tackle a lot of different problems. none of them is killing the planet on their own, but we need to look at the big picture

it’s one of the things that’s killing the planet

i wouldn’t call it sustainable if the end result is an unlivable planet, if nothing is done about the emissions

that’s what i’m doing here in finland

sustainable means nothing if something that is killing the planet counts as sustainable

source?

fuck xavier

unsustainable for the environment, here’s the source that you wanted. milk’s greenhouse gas emissions are very high compared to plant based alternatives, alongside land use and water consumption.

made what case? do i really have to specifically state that i don’t get paid for random comments on an irrelevant platform?

do you actually think governments would hire people to debate on platforms pretty much nobody is using, when they can just deploy a shit ton of llm bots on reddit (which they do btw). like this idea is incredibly stupid.

now that i’ve addressed what you wanted, respond to my points, please.

there’s no such thing as a nation of taiwan, or the republic of china, in the eyes of the international law. that’s what matters.

your “democratic nation” doesn’t exist in the eyes of almost the entire world.

the only difference between taiwan and china is that china is a communist country and the government in taiwan is a capitalist vassal state of the united states. the culture is the same, the language is the same, the history is the same (except for after 1949 when kuomintang started ruling taiwan under a dictatorship under martial law, which was later followed by liberal democracy as late as 1987

the only reason people want taiwan to be a separate country is because it’s pro-western and capitalist. there’s no real logical argument to be had for its independence. it’s just people being scared of big scary china and want it to be balkanized as much as possible to not threaten the western hegemony. the independence movement makes as much sense as like idk, a zhejiang independence movement (if the region was ruled by capitalists).

only on mobile

sure thing. what pejorative will u come up with next to distract from the fact that you can’t address what i’m saying?

italy is cheese?

well the thing is that there weren’t 8.3 billion people in the past, and a shit ton of other pollutants

nah, it’s just simply the novorossiya flag

or OBAMNA

another great response when you aren’t able to address what’s being said

this is a great response when you aren’t able to address what’s being said, same with the other guy

this was a tradition until the early 2020s

they will still find a way to blame it on china