Appearances, preconceptions, stereotypes… are shortcuts used to deal with complex issues. Since VCs don’t really care about 90% of the startups, they only need to weed out the worst ideas, in the quickest way possible.

Story time: When I was 20, I had some job interviews lined up, so a family friend helped me pick a decent looking suit and robe that weren’t too expensive. Got offered 3 different jobs in a single week 🤷

As long as you can re-disable it after playing the game…

I know, all background processes get impacted during gameplay, but that was the case already. The popup can explain the tradeoff, and who’s to blame (game dev).

The new kernel.split_lock_mitigate knob, if set to zero, will disable the penalization of processes using split locking (while retaining the warning sent to the system log)

Sounds to me like it’s fixed. WINE could follow dmesg, and show a popup with recommendations when it detects one of its processes is getting throttled.

There are two sides to that story.

There is not enough gold to match the increases in both population and productivity of the last 70 years, and you don’t want just a handful of people holding gold that spikes in value through the roof.

Smart people invest in companies that pay dividends. Speculators invest in… whatever, tulip bulbs.

Q: What do you call a business that destroys itself?
A: Failed business model.

Sometimes, the only way to learn that, is through pain.

Get VC funding… like this:

Schiffmann posits himself as older now, wiser, more experienced than he was when he first debuted the Friend necklace. (He is 22.) He has grown out his hair and cultivated a beard

A wise 22 year old with a beard… 😮‍💨

The VCs are clueless, they jump on a bunch of “feels good” and “disruptive young blood” stuff, hoping that maybe 1 in 10 will not fall and burn.

deleted by creator

There is a reason why people keep asking “How do you spell it?” when being told a name in English. The counterpart is, “How do you pronounce it?”.

Even with “long a”, I still can’t tell how would you want to pronounce “Rach”. I can come up with 4 different pronounciations right now: “Ra-ah-ch”, “Ra-ah”, “Ra-sh”, “Ra-kh”.

Try an RP chatbot.

They are far from perfect, but also far from the “helpful assistant” sycophants.

It’s not about capitalism:

• 1 human can talk to 1 human
• 1 chatbot can talk to 8 billion humans

Human therapy will be more expensive, for as long as we value human time more than machine time.

The complaint is: Narcissistic incompetent dev spreads FUD while putting vulnerable people at risk.

There is an experimental distributed open source search engine: https://dawnsearch.org/

It has a series of issues of its own, though.

Per-user weighting was out of the reach of hardware 20 years ago… and is still out of the reach of anything other than very large distributed systems. No single machine is currently capable of holding even the index for the ~200 million active websites, much less the ~800 billion webpages in the Wayback Machine. Multiple page attributes… yes, that would be great, but again things escalate quickly. The closest “hope”, would be some sort of LLM on the scale of hundreds of trillions of parameters… and even that might fall short.

Distributed indexes, with queries getting shared among peers, mean that privacy goes out the window. Homomorphic encryption could potentially help with that, but that requires even more hardware.

TL;DR: it’s being researched, but it’s hard.

The basic algorithm is quite straightforward, it’s the scale and edge cases that make it hard to compete.

“Ideally”, from a pure data perspective, everybody would have all the data and all the processing power to search through it on their own with whatever algorithm they prefer, like a massive P2P network of per-person datacenters.

Back to reality, that’s pretty much insanely impossible. So we get a few search engines, with huge entry costs, offering more value the larger they get… which leads to lock-in, trying to game their algorithms, filtering, monetization, and all the other issues.

There’s a good commentary about that in here:

AWS CEO Matt Garman just said what everyone is thinking about AI replacing software developers

“That’s like, one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard,” he said. “They’re probably the least expensive employees you have, they’re the most leaned into your AI tools.”

“How’s that going to work when ten years in the future you have no one that has learned anything,”

https://www.itpro.com/software/development/aws-ceo-matt-garman-just-said-what-everyone-is-thinking-about-ai-replacing-software-developers

Here we go, more Mickey Mouse fueled BS. Instead of fixing the preposterous “until author’s death + 70 years” copyright term, the result is a world where tearing up books to train AI is legal, and a class lawsuit settlement with “7 million claimaints” who will get none of it.

Lawyer circus, is what this is.

US-based nodes

Tor has nodes all over the world: https://tormap.org/

Probably more helpful to say “Stop using VPNs to watch porn”… helpful for VPN providers’ sales, I mean.

Education is supposed to teach “how to learn to learn”.

Left to his own devices, then, without knowing quite what to ask or how to interpret the responses, the man in this case study “did his own research”

The whole thing with “do your own research”, is kind of funny:

• some use it to avoid explaining their points
• others use it to come up with a lot of nonsense
• while the proper way to begin any “research”, is to… ask an expert.

Nobody has ended up in a psych hold, just by reading a bunch of Wikipedia articles, asking ChatGPT… then consulting a doctor.

Not sure if I’m not explaining myself, or you’re choosing to not understand me. I’m going to leave it here.

Kind of like saying that ChatGPT is people adding an AI player to the deterministic program of a chat… nah, I’m not going to discuss that. Tic-tac-toe is a classical example problem for neural networks 101, kind of a “hello world”.