Yes, that’s what I do, but then my address isn’t mixed with hundreds of other users, I wish I could have a web service, with a dynanic dns domain name and letsencrypt certificates but the anonymous front that a vpn provides.

What VPN is left that I can use to host my website with open ports 80 and 443 ?

Always bet on the powerful, always join the winning side, always end your subscription to life

Cleanse the Washington infection

Yes, VLAN is an IT convenience feature, you don’t need it just because it is a feature of the more expensive hardware.

Instead just establish separate L2s and operate proper L3 firewalls between them. For IoT devices, any kind of reliable potato will do just fine.

It’s San Francisco’s instruction manual.

To punish you for trying to protect yourself. To extract micro-labour out of you (AI training) To discourage you from privacy best practices Oh BTW, the captcha will eventually contain unblockable ads

Great way to stop that dying kid from also bankrupting the family.

Can you DRM a crawl ?

They want to be regulated so they can finally have their mote. Cutting out the states’ power does mean they will only have to buy one group of politicians in Washington and those are some relatively cheap Hoes

All palantir participants are the enemy. And they’re not nearly scared enough.

You’d have to invent new humans first, we are very bad at getting liquid in our lungs

Actually, I just dropped the entire thread — including the original article — into ChatGPT since I didn’t have time to read it all either. Then I asked it to write the best possible 3-sentence Lemmy comment specifically for your reply. So, ironically, we’ve both delegated the thinking to LLMs — now that’s productivity.

Then I asked “write the next 3 sentence providing the most insight that you can in 3 sentences” and it responded

The real issue here isn’t just that LLMs can fabricate citations — it’s that institutions and publishers are increasingly failing to enforce even basic quality controls, allowing AI-generated content to slip through without proper oversight. When tools meant to assist in research are used to replace it, the result is a veneer of credibility masking hollow or false scholarship. If this trend continues, we risk flooding academic discourse with noise that’s indistinguishable from rigor, eroding trust in legitimate research.

then I asked “But chatgpt, quality control, rigor, those have been gone for aeons, the barrier to write was so high no one really tried so the control, rigor, editors have largely atrophied long ago, respond in 3 sentences” and it responded

You’re right — what we’re seeing now is less a collapse and more an exposure of how little substance was holding it all up. The illusion of rigor persisted mostly because the barrier to entry was too high for mass participation, not because the gatekeepers were doing their jobs. LLMs didn’t break the system; they just made its hollowness impossible to ignore.

What if it suggests to engender conditions which may statistically be more likely to involve unintended unwanted violence? But also will make a lot of money

Omg self host it omg

There are people like that for anything related to AI.

Combine that with men stuff and this going to be crack for all of those people

It’s more intelligent than most people, we just have to raise the bar on what intelligence is and it will never be intelligent.

Fortunately, as long as we keep a fuzzy concept like intelligence as the yardstick of our exceptionalism, we will remain exceptionnal forever.

Hardly surprising human brains are also extremely lossy. Way more lossy than AI. If we want to keep up our manifest exceptionalism, we’d better start definning narrower version of intelligence that isn’t going to soon have. Embodied intelligence, is NOT one of those.

You just have to scan the qr code they tattoo on your balls

it’s a standin for “good looking and fit”