3·
10 months agoI mean, you can simply define something differently than the last 50 years of researchers in computer science. It’s just not going to make a difference.
- 0 Posts
- 40 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: September 14th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
4·10 months agoJavaOS
No 16 gigs is ok for an LLM
On your gpu
I’ve developed “AI” using prolog.
No machine learning, you’re still solving problems using logical reasoning and deduction that’s not intuitively obvious for humans.
Machine learning isn’t the only form of AI.
1·10 months agoMay I interest you in firefly III?
From what I understand you obfuscate the port in order to limit the amount of incoming attacks. But then fail2ban would be a much more effective tool.
The disinterested aspect you described is the actual problem. Because it’s based on the assumption your port won’t be found, but it definitely will, and as soon as that happens you’ll end up in a database such as shodan and the entire effect is GONE.
Obfuscation is not security, changing the port doesn’t increase your security
I wouldn’t be overly harsh.
Some logos/images/designs are simply hardwired to the function that they can’t remember where the apps are if the logo changes. I’m pretty sure I’ll be the same if I use something for 30 years.
Well especially if the previous comment asked “or am I missing something”.
Obviously I could be wrong that’s why I said I THINK
You’re just going to shift goalposts every time I’ll post something.
Not recent enough. Not enough cases. That’s different.
And lastly you’ll just claim I do it because I’m an arch maximalist, despite not knowing anything about me :)
Exactly, why would they even put napkins out if the customers still come.
Yeah you’re missing the point that the mind blown is just ironic.
The entire point here was to demonstrate that the “security” features of these DEs are not implemented by the DE but by the underlying components such as PAM, and you can just ignore the DE until you have the basics fixed.
What’s the point in having a super duper secure login screen if I can bypass it by booting from a USB stick for example.
Yeah just like the FORCED Microsoft updates that broke like hundreds of businesses?
Dude go touch some grass
What the duck has this to do with anything.
The entire point is that your DE has NO security features at all, those come ALL from the underlying system such as PAM for example, managing the authentication and such.
These stupid strawmans “huhr dur watch a video”
Besides that I’ll just answer the straw man argument anyway because it’s even stupid if you take it seriously YES YOU CAN ACTUALLY LAUNCH GUI (such as a game) DIRECTLY FROM TTY.
And I quote
LoL
What the duck has this to do with anything.
The entire point is that your DE has NO security features at all, those come ALL from the underlying system such as PAM for example, managing the authentication and such.
These stupid strawmans “huhr dur watch a video”
Besides that I’ll just answer the straw man argument anyway because it’s even stupid if you take it seriously YES YOU DO ACTUALLY LAUNCH GUI DIRECTLY FROM TTY.
I think you missed the point. Switch the tty to realize your de is irrelevant in regards to security, because you don’t even need one…
You really should press Ctrl+alt+f3 on your lock screen and get your mind blown.
Then you’re on your own. What the duck 🦆 do you expect to happen if you can’t even invest the 10sec to skim over a message (in the few events that there even is one) to see if it affects you and any manual intervention is required.
I vote for naming this branch “mommy”, since all other branches are it’s offspring, and related to it.