AFAIK California doesn’t require a license for ebikes.
Melllvar
Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!
- 0 Posts
- 326 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
It is a theory to explain how genie knows about things like automobiles and 20th century movie stars. It posits that these are only anachronisms if the story is set in the past, as commonly assumed. But setting it in the far distant future eliminates the problem. It also explains the apparent “magic” in the world as remnants of a fallen high-tech civilization.
Rajah the tiger? Genetic engineered. Magic carpet? Hover tech. Buried stop signs (video game only)? Ancient relic. It’s really quite surprising how well this theory fits.
Throw in the fan theory that Disney’s version takes place thousands of years in the future.
You mean like… speaking to someone in the same room? While they’re looking at you? With their eyes?!
Goofy at the bottom
From the phrasing and context, I was expecting something else when I clicked.
Found the original panel, can’t find the whole comic.
NSFW obviously.
13·15 days agoDon’t forget the Snake game.
At first I thought this was an announcement from Microsoft.
1·22 days agoKrombiception, of course.
…you do have krombiception, don’t you?
According to my extensive 30 seconds of research, the difference is that a sauce is an integral ingredient, but a condiment is added after the dish is served. In which case, ketchup can be either or both, even in the same dish.
Parent: Say “dad”
Baby: “Dad”
Don’t leave us hanging. Who won the argument?
“Not do anything useful” would be more accurate than “do nothing”. But that’s just my tl;dr.
[…] the resolution also contains many unbalanced, inaccurate, and unwise provisions the United States cannot support. This resolution does not articulate meaningful solutions for preventing hunger and malnutrition or avoiding their devastating consequences.
The United States is concerned that the concept of “food sovereignty” could justify protectionism or other restrictive import or export policies […]
We also do not accept any reading of this resolution or related documents that would suggest that States have particular extraterritorial obligations arising from any concept of a “right to food,” which we do not recognize and has no definition in international law.
tl;dr:
- The USA doesn’t think the resolution actually does anything useful, even if it supports the intention
- The USA, the largest exporter of food, is concerned how the resolution might impact food exports
- The USA doesn’t recognize the imposition of legal obligations to act outside of its own territory
But the resolution passed anyway, which is why world hunger has disappeared.
26·1 month agoReminds me of the old trick on HTML forms where you use CSS to make one of the form fields invisible to humans and reject any submission that filled in that field.
49·2 months agoInformation superhighway
E099: PROGRAMMER IS OVERLY POLITE
Fair game.