bluemoon

okay, phew =) i got anxious for some reason.

bro people need therapy not this shit. it’s not okay to the people who have 0 braincells and never self-educate to say it’s alright as a substitute. get therapy and live a better life where people can trust you have good intentions. like imagine the dude just going “haha lolis are okay” then this falls out of his wardrobe. nobody will help that dude. he’ll feel awful and move away from everybody out of shame when he gets shamed and harassed. it isn’t right to the 0-braincell pedos to allow this shit. let therapy be the ones to give them acknowledgement for these substitutes instead

ban temu shein for this shit and the toxic chemicals in their clothes. second hand stores already refuse those brands.

are you an AI asking to be trained or something? your entire post culminates in that it’s people’s faults for not doing better, phones not being the issue and these analog bags being kinda moot.

i don’t wanna comment anymore incase you take my posts antagonistically, i think we’re reading differently. no offense meant! have a good day

lmao i added to the word of mouth here, that was the point.

ofcourse HP sells more. they’re a market monopoly that polemically and aggressively remove common knowledge of competitors when able to.

i sense a /neutral tone is important to add from me. i come in peace ✌️

so specifying it’s others wrong for being on their phone so much is a critique

MLK was spreading a good christiany though

and coups aren’t accepted anywhere else than authoritarian dictatorships like Ruzzia & USA. so like authoritarianism and the wack education system is a big start.

this reminds me of many instances of undesireable policymaking where algorithms just connected state personell with agendas of politicians through the black box of social media… like a judge who got the thoughts of a politician on certain rulings which is illegal in nordic countries. like the message of “hey what if climate activists are obstructing capital ventures in law? can a judge try that?” is illegal for a politician to ask of a judge here, yet through social media it happened. she didn’t see that politician’s exact words but was bombarded by posts and probably ads that shaped the way she thought about her job as a juridical arbiter of lives. left uncorrelated in mainstream

like modos, the open source e-ink kit with as fast refresh rates as LCD screens? on crowdsource right now

and as “open printer”? open source printer with refillable ink cartridges, no tracking shenanigans, a repairable design and possibility to just put a roll of paper (at most A3 in width) then letting it print bannerolls… crowdsource too iirc

so osmosis? kinda like the consensus people form from being on the internetverse - not knowing just where they picked a fact or perspective up from, but touting it as an obvious fact or perspective that everyone has

so just like crypto & AI: a ponzo scheme

time to rice a linux to camoflague the desktop. as long as it looks like windows theyll not see the difference right

but… use Unix.

no, i mean you’re critizising the way a societal change is happening and i add some thoughts to that.

i mean strong emotions lead to collective change. telling a person they should Not express all this emotion and Not talk about it like they do just isolates the person into not feeling it’s a big trend. also increases self-shaming. then it never happens for those who obviously have been unsuccsessful so far. /info

i mean culturally i also relate to the older generation in the case of digitalization if i grew up rurally with poorer parents. so a zoomer in a millenial cultural upbringing since poor + rural = lagging on trends. i’d call it millenial

as others’ve typed out: not a zero sum act.

just below two hours a day and brain isn’t rotting.

also i’d reformulate: not necessarily simultaneous, just some time. can be disjointed in time: to look up or record and to do in the everyday groove.

be, you will

you are cool and i am proud of you, random person online