So your point is that Johnson only agrees that he’s unwell, but not unhinged? Also, your example isn’t even close to the same flow of conversation. He didn’t reply with a deflection, he literally said “And some people on your side are too”. Whether he intended to agree or not is debatable, but his statement is absolutely agreeing because he used the word “too” AND didn’t mention anything completely unrelated like in your example.
I politely disagree, saying “too” is as blatant of an agreement as he could’ve said. He tried to deflect, but failed and agreed.
LMAO, reading the submissions on that website are hilarious. Three quarters of the posts on there are super level-headed, saying they don’t believe he should have died but they can’t mourn or feel sympathy for someone so horrible; IMO, Charlie Kirk absolutely deserved to die. Wanting fascists dead shouldn’t be a hot take, it should be the norm.
Humor?
True, Nazis and fascists deserve a bullet. Many have forgotten that and consider those ideals a valid political opinion.
Fascism has no place in a democracy, it will slowly destroy us if no one pushes back.
After the attempt on Trump, I thought these guys had force fields around them. One shot, 200 yards, and a great day.
They’ll ramp up, but they would’ve anyways.
I think this is a net positive, especially because the shooter was reportedly an old white guy
Oh no, a low quality shitpost.
That last point is why I pirate all my Kanye
I FEEL THIS. My bank tells me its not possible to turn it off on my checking account. Blows my fucking mind they can’t just deny a tranaction if I don’t have the money even if I ask 😭
Fr, you can disagree with someone and still make use of the software they create. Especially because you’re not even directly supporting them monetarily.
Nah, the results are still consistently much worse imo (excluding sponsored results from Google), and I use DDG daily
Fountain pen master race
Only valid answer
Joking about those things does not make him any better or worse, it’s comedy. Ending that behavior is not an opportunity to be better.
I think that’s obtuse, comedy has no limits: As long as you don’t act upon uncomfortable / morally reprehensible ideas you joke about, you aren’t any worse or better than if you had never joked about it. I would argue that exposing a bunch of people for what they joke about with no evidence that they’ve actually done something wrong is far worse than joking about offensive subjects. (one has zero negative affects, the other has many)
(I must say I disagree completely with that guy sharing messages from his girlfriend- that piece is very weird and a total breach of trust)
100%, the liability issue is the main reason I’m against self driving vehicles.
I think it’s an attempt at an anti-truth what-aboutism, which Mike Johnson failed to come up with and accidentally agreed.