Why don’t they just rename it to “AdOS” already?

oh man… I’m such a dumb dumb … didn’t even try 10.3.0, now I did and the docker version works and is extremely fast, compared to a CPU… Thank you so much.

It would the first scenario you described… i’d just interact with a chatbot occasionally like I do with chatgpt now…but I’d also like to try to experiment with copilot like models to test and use with vscode. So no training of models or 24/7 batch operations.

I was wondering whether a custom built gaming PC is the only solution here or if there are other cjeaper alternatives that get the job decently done

I have the exact same gpu and tried that. But couldn’t get ollama docker version (rocm) to work with the gpu. even changing the env variable to 10.30.1. (rocminfo reports gfx1031)

would you mind giving some instructions or a link?

Yeah, I’ve already heard about such a solution, where I’d need a Pi that acts as the streaming client, which then should work with any camera.

can these be configured to stream TO a remote frigate server?

Example: I’d like to install one at my parent’s house, connect it to my parent’s wifi, but have it stream to frigate, that’s hosted on my server in another city?

I think this part should be better left off to the actual tool that does a more promising job on security, like a firewall.

crane and slipt… I even call it the crane-game 😂

yeah it was indeed difficult to guess

oh… it’s a game where every day there’s a 5 letter word you have to guess.

you start with a random word and it shows you if the letters are in its corect place (green), wrong place (yellow) or they don’t occur at all (gray).

then you keep on guessing until you find the word or reach the limit.

where’s the “N”?

nope

Lol… that’s exactly what I use, the left part of the launcher.

• Leave home network => Turn on VPN
• Enter home network => Turn off VPN

Sure, but I was talking about the basic concept of how things work in general to keep it simple for OP.

in a nutshell

This is how the control and information exchange of smart devices work:

Phone App -> [Server] … [Server] -> Smart Device and vice versa

There’s no way around this concept.

Now, Google gives you the phone app and the (public) server part. but these only work with their servers and apps, keeping you locked in.

HA gives you the same, a server and an app, but allows you to keep the server private (access via vpn for public)

Also who guarantees that Google Home will be there in the next few years? HA will still keep running even if it ever gets abandoned.

you can give Flutter a try. It’d be perfect for such an app.

I’d automate the shit out of this one if I were to write an app.

thinking of something like this one

• using phones google location for tracking (or something else)
• hava a Bluetooth beacon in the car
• each time you get in the car, beacon connects to phone
• app “tracks” the collected location data as “driving”

Authelia is meant to be an SSO (like Google). In order to use it, you have to create users (and passwords) within the authelia yaml file, or connect it to light-ldap and do it via ldaps web gui.

You probably have other services running, i.e. immich, etc. These can be configured to use auhelias OIDC to authenticate the user against. you’d still need to create the users within the service, since I doubt they get auto-created.

Now, you can decide for yourself, whether to put your bitwarden behind authelia or not, and I’m not sure how the mobile apps work in this sense, if at all.

If you decide to do so, you just give your users their authelia/lightldap creds, if not, you additionally have to give them their bitwarden creds.

Yes! It should work :-D