Traister101

If we can all sit around and agree that once you hit a certain age you shouldn’t be allowed to drive anymore Voting should be the topic right after

By default inlay hints are enabled so you wouldn’t have to do that. But yeah it’s tied to using the editor which makes it a non solution

Right cause the boolean isn’t a named type. If you have two possible states that can be represented with a boolean, or an enum of the two possible states which embeds more info into the callsite

Which is bullshit. You already had to enable external installs this is just them even farther encroaching on our ownership of our devices.

Pirate Software is a guy who has your same exact wrong idea about the Stop Killing Games movement. I’m sorry you independently arrived to the same misunderstanding

Go back to your pirate software streams

The wope (woke Pope) seems alright. Better than the last one at least and that guy was pretty good too

Frankly I expect the kernel dudes to be pretty good about this, their style guides alone are quite strick and any funny business in a PR that isn’t marked correctly is I think likely a ban from making PRs at all. How it worked beforehand, as already stated by others is the author says “I promise this follows the rules” and that’s basically the end of it. Giving an official avenue for generated code is a great way to reduce the negatives of it that’ll happen anyway. We know this from decades of real life experience trying to ban things like alcohol or drugs, time after time providing a legal avenue with some rules makes things safer. Why wouldn’t we see a similar effect here?

That’s their problem. If they are using an LLM and cannot verify the output they shouldn’t be using an LLM

Indeed, it’s just called installing there

Isn’t it also like opt in? If you don’t annotate a type it just defaults to Any, which is just unchecked like standard JS

Tell me you haven’t used a back button without telling me.

To TLDR you pretend the back button on android is the back button on your mouse, because it is. Does it seem useful yet?

Nah Ryuko generally just looks different but the easiest one is her hair, she’s got just a red “strand”. Also notable is the outfit, Ryuko wouldn’t wear anything with that neck thing going on

What about the borrow checker needs an overhaul? Seems to do it’s job quite well. If you want to remove it then you should use like C++ or Zig or something since the borrow checker is fairly fundemenal to the design of the language

In theory, but the gas tax isn’t anywhere near high enough for that so most of the money ends up coming from property taxes which ironically also aren’t high enough in the suburbs so they siphon money away from citities to pay for it

If I could trust that the people in government know how computers work I’d be down but well I can’t

As a Gen z who managed to not be an idiot I’m unconvinced it’s the technology when even in my elementary school years I was beginning to realize how shit the school system is. Technology probably doesn’t make things better but it was failing me in elementary school when the best of the best was the massive brick of a computer Macs in the computer lab was all we had

Here. Read this https://flowchainsensei.wordpress.com/2026/02/04/the-software-quality-and-productivity-crisis-executives-wont-address/

Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:

• 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
• 75% of projects are expected to fail
• 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
• Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
• The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending

Yet they choose:

• Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
• Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
• Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
• To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
• To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems

This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.

That’s on the dev end of things but yes. Part of the build pipeline was re-obfuscation of your code so it’d actually work. Forge the mod loader just loaded the mods and provided code for modders to use. Forge Gradle was what handled the obfuscation stuff in dev

Consider for a moment the only thing we can confidently say they are reacting is things that would harm the perpetrators. They’ve redacted everybody but a victim time and again across the files they’ve released, frequently they’ll react a perp in one document only to leave it unredacted in the next despite it having identical content (namely the text messages as there is message text contents as well as screenshots). Seeing as they already fail to redact child porn and are definitely redacting things that’ll implicate people, including even Epstein I think you can make an extremely good argument they shouldn’t be redacted at all when it’s being done so plainly maliciously