Goddamn, didn’t think it was that deep

Brainrot

You can still play Roblox with Sober. Just sometimes it doesn’t work (like during bigger events).

I can always just buy a Windows licence

Or use massgrave.dev and get it for free.

Like if you produce bottled water, and you lower the quality of it (like, idk maybe theres stuff floating inside) so its cheaper to make, people will notice and switch to an alternative. And when the alternative tries something similar, they’ll switch back to you.

So now you have 2 companies selling bottled water with stuff floating in it.

I used to have 2 ssds with one for Windows, the other for Linux. When I needed more space for games I just gave up on Windows and haven’t since looked back. (Also converted one of my friends to dual-booting Mint).

Massive if factual

Put an treadmill on the train.

Fedora because it has (IMO) the best vanilla GNOME experience. Every application is in the same theme and looks similar.

The banussy

3080 mobile is “old”?

Where I live, if a person on the crosswalk doesn’t move out the way of an ambulance, it goes on the national news lol.

𓀾 | 𓀾 𓀕
----|----
𓀾 𓀾 | 𓀾 𓁀

And OpenSUSE?

Freedom fries 2.0

Please don’t call AI slop “art”.

It’s 50/50.

the things you listed are most certainly not a requirement.

Then what are? Why wouldn’t the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell be requirements for ownership?

If “ownership” doesn’t have a unified meaning, then I can interpret “ownership” as the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell the bought item.

You were arguing that having control over something (as in “being able to maintain/repair, modify or even resell” it) isn’t a requirement for the thing’s ownership?

Then what does “ownership” entail? Being allowed to use the thing but not modify or repair it? I’d argue that this isn’t what “ownership” means.