Coincidentally, the least trainable dog I have ever met was an Italian greyhound like the one in your picture.
Coincidentally, the least trainable dog I have ever met was an Italian greyhound like the one in your picture.
I agree that the bot is problematic and don’t think it provides valuable information. I personally have it blocked. Leaving the community and blocking the bot both result in one less person advocating against the bot.
Wouldn’t it be easier to just block the bot?
Refreshing once you’re in reader mode fixes that issue for me sometimes.
You don’t like paying $15 for a tiny burger?
Experian has a program where you connect your bank account and they monitor transactions for things that could improve your credit by a couple points. I’m sure they’re not also harvesting the rest of your data to use in their analytics, right?
Hot take here, but I generally trust the governing bodies of the sporting events to figure that stuff out since I’m not an expert.
And if you make cold brew in advance, it’s saves a lot of time in the morning. It’s even good heated up in the microwave, but I drink it iced year round.
And so do your ears, via the Eustachian tubes! They drain to your throat, I don’t know how close the eye/ear drains are to each other.
The 3% is full RTO, down from 8% last year. The article goes into all the details.
That’s a great point that I hadn’t considered. Posting on every post also keeps it neutral instead of seeming to only target certain sources.
Another idea. What about not posting the comment when the rating is “high credibility”?
After seeing the comment on a few posts, the length is really bothering me. I don’t want to block the bot since it’s useful information. What about a single line of text with a link to “read more”?
Example with explanations:
404 Media is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check. (change Media Bias Fact Check to a link that goes to a post explaining what they do, the reason for the bot, and a link to their donation page)
Check the bias and credibility of this article on ground.news. (change “this article” to be a link instead of displaying link in plain text)
How it might look:
404 Media is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Check the bias and credibility of this article on ground.news.
I wish it was reduced down to two or three lines tops. It’s longer than some of the useless reddit automod comments.
If you click into the link it defines “pro science bias”.
The “footer” section is very long, and the spoiler tags don’t seem to do anything on the Boost app. This makes the bot comment take up an entire screen on mobile.
You’re on the right track with the cedar. I searched for cedar shake style siding and came across this product that looks similar. https://www.jameshardie.com/product-catalog/exterior-siding-products/hardie-shingle-siding/straight-edge-panel/statement-collection-colors/
I usually get a bowl, my partner gets tacos. The tacos are a much smaller serving of food. The last time we got Chipotle, both food containers weighed about the same. We haven’t been back since, despite there being a location very close to where we live. Once before that the rice was visibly under cooked (it looks slightly more opaque). At this point it would take some “free food” coupons for me to bother with them again.
Calm down there Panera.
I personally use LLMs in the workplace. It’s great for generating boilerplate code, especially stuff that is often very repetitive like test classes.