It’s not attention addiction. Note that it’s supposed to replace consumption with creative / problem solving activities. If you’re addicted to watercolors, at least you will be getting better at the craft. If you’re just consuming online content / doomscrolling you’re just wasting time.
I read somewhere it runs custom software so it’s not like it’s usable tech. Best if you can fence it quickly to someone greedy for low price it’ll serve them right for buying obviously stolen goods.
Interesting, I had assumed that turning down temperature to 0, or hardcoding a seed would make LLM inference deterministic.
Especial after watching this video https://youtu.be/J9ZKxsPpRFk
So you say its not random, and now you do a 180 and say that randomness is a good thing?
I should have known you are a troll
So, in your learned opinion, it’s deterministic?
You still need a software engineer to review the code. It’s naive to think that randomly generated code will work, and by “work” i mean not just do what it’s supposed to, but also handle edge cases and be secure.
A developer here, I usually list user - facing changes in the Changelog.
Even if the changes are not listed, general “bug fixes and performance improvements” is a worthwhile update too. These updates can contain fixes to annoying UX glitches, or really speed up the app, if a new faster API endpoint was added to the backend, and app change is needed to make use of it. You will also get security updates, to the app and its bundled libraries which is important nowadays.
Google does a lot of A/B testing, so listing new changes may be pointless as the new features may be available only to select few.
Also developers have no incentive to document changes. It’s a hassle to compile a list of changes since last release, and people don’t read the Changelog for every release, especially with auto updates on.
I’d be great if they could at least use an LLM to compile the Changelog
Even if you rebase you can still recover the original commits until they are garbage collected. You are generally safe as long as the .git directory isn’t deleted, in which case your whole history is gone anyway.
Sounds like a flawed workflow, if this didn’t go through at least code review. Was it committed directly to master?
Curious to know what kind of system relies on hashed not changing? Technically the hashes don’t change, but a new set of commits is made. The history diverges, and you can still keep the old master if you need it for some time, even cherry pick patches to it…
Fedora does this too, it reboots to install updates…
And came out screaming, so I’m on the fence on this one
You’re not using the equipment to its full potential!
I was hoping for this. I was not let down.
Unusable for me on Fedora. I’m unable to watch movies or videos over network from NAS, have to copy it first
I like it. It’s dumb fun, but it’s funny and I like to laugh.
My robot vac just moves the bowls under the fridge by himself
It likely includes stuff like timezones, timers, alarms,supports multiple languages. The update could be fixing a typo in Hungarian translation for all I know, or fix layout for displaying timezones on ultra wide screen 🤷♂️
Software development is complex, even for seemingly most trivial things.
If you take one look at the app on the [windows store](Windows Clock - Free download and install on Windows | Microsoft Store https://share.google/4wV9U8aDXtMySbd0j) and see the screen shots, you’ll understand it does more than display time.
All apps need updates as new features are added. The problem on windows the updates are slow and UX is poor.
Nobody’s complaining about android clock needing updates, because they’re seamless.
I didn’t know this, and I’m sure a lot other people don’t know this and that’s why they fork - to have their own copy of the repo, thinking they have full control over it.
I have forked projects in the past and IIRC i had to send a request to be disassociated from the original repo, otherwise all pull requests default to the original repo which is annoying.