• 0 Posts
  • 169 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle
  • The welfare state isn’t capitalism working as intended. That wasn’t what I was saying, nor am I saying that the welfare state is a result of capitalism. That was ultimately a result of workers fighting for their rights.

    What I am saying is that the government not leaning heavily into laisez-faire capitalism, and them interfering in capitalism where needed, is what is making the European capitalist model largely work as capitalism is supposed to work. The government is there to prevent negative externalities and prevent monopolies from forming.

    Ultimately the “correct” implementation of capitalism doesn’t exist. Only one which creates the most benefit for the people while reducing its negative outcomes.

    It is a tool you can use in places where it makes sense to use it in order to drive innovation and lower costs to consumers.
    The government can set regulations in order to guide capitalism to that outcome, and can directly interfere to do things themselves in industries where it deems fit to do so.

    Edit: Fixed a typo in my first sentence, making me say the exact opposite of what I was trying to say…









  • They’re both very similar.

    Both still use Google and Bing for part of their search results (albeit with the search queries somewhat anonymised). And both have been working together on a European search index which they have been slowly rolling out over the past year orso now.

    Ecosia differentiates itself from the competition by using part of their profits to plant trees, and by promising that their servers are run on renewable energy.

    Personally I use Ecosia over Qwant, because I found the search results for news articles to be a bit better. But ultimately both are very similar.






  • I don’t think laws should be enforced at any cost, but if we can reasonably enforce laws I think there is a duty to do so.

    Then there is also a different question of whether we agree with the laws on the books, but that is a different matter imo. Personally I don’t think we should limit access to pornography as strictly as the laws says we should, and I don’t think the ills of social media are solved with a simple age limit.

    But that is a separate discussion from the implementation of a (in my eyes) reasonable approach to age verification


  • The skepticism is very understandable. It is important to scrutinise solutions like this to make sure that they indeed do as they say they do, and to make sure the government doesn’t overreach with their authority.

    That said, it should also be possible for laws to be enforced, and there are laws on the books that are supposed to prevent children from accessing things that we as a society have agreed they have no business accessing (alcohol, tabacco, porn, and increasingly commonly social media)

    Currently there is no good method to actually enforce those laws on the internet, so there needs to be a solution for that.
    I think this form of age verification may be a decent compromise between privacy and the need to enforce these existing laws.

    Edit: Typo. I wrote “they” instead of “that”




  • From my understanding this age verification app seems to be based on the age verification blueprint they have been working on for a while now, which is supposed to be part of the European “digital wallet”

    https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification

    From my understanding it works as follows:

    • There will be a central “authority”, with which you can identify
    • This authority will provide you with tokens indicating you are 18+ (or whatever age verfication you may need)
    • These tokens are stored locally, and contain no identifying information other than a simple “is this guy 18+?”
    • You can use these tokens to verify age with a website that requires age verification

    This solution does seemingly address my two greatest concern with online age verficiation:

    • You cannot trust the website, so they only get the information they need. They don’t get any identifiable information
    • You cannot trust the authority, so they don’t get to know for which websites and for what reason you request 18+ tokens

    Assuming that this blueprint is followed, it seems like a decent approach at online age verification.