HuddaBudda

If I have to hear one more thought Donald Trump has about this case.

I have blue balls for justice starting from 4 years ago. And nothing but Trump commentary (arguable the least horny thing on this planet) to keep me occupied.

And I am about to pay a porn star hush money to beat me in a Trump outfit if I don’t start seeing some justice.

Looks at the entirety of the internet

Oh no.

What is their obsession with this dude?

According to the Fox report, House Ways and Means Committee chair Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) says Biden “mischaracterized” his role working for his own firm, Rosemont Seneca. Biden said that he didn’t “control” the bank accounts for the company and they were not “affiliated with him.”

Really? ? Wake me up when republican’s find evidence. Otherwise, this is just the same circus with the same clowns.

The jury haven’t even made a ruling yet… All they’ve done is listen…

“You are going into a kangaroo court. There’s nothing more. Nothing less. There’d be absolutely no reason, no justification to do that whatsoever.” - Donald Trump Jr.

Not even an excuse? , if the jury only has one side of the story that is what they are going with.

If you aren’t even going to put your fists up and spend all your time arguing with the referee, you can’t complain when you get KO’ed

This was a huge problem even when Trump was running.

It’s not like people tried to warn them, but I guess the idea that older generation that have a harder time moving around might actually want/need mail in ballots to vote.

You know, being considerate of your voters and such.

Possession of a controlled substance classified in Schedule III of the Drug Control Act, upon conviction, exposes the violator to a misdemeanor conviction for which the punishment is confinement in jail for up to twelve months and a fine up to $2,500, either or both.

I feel like I am missing a piece of the puzzle.

How does this legalize weed? This feel like the same thing as last time with less jail time.

7-2

I bet, can guess who those 2 were without even looking.

Justice Clarence Thomas reached back to the earliest days of the Constitution in his majority opinion to note that “the Bureau’s funding mechanism fits comfortably with the First Congress’ appropriations practice.”

Hmmm… surprising… maybe public pressure does work.

Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, Thomas’ colleagues in the court’s conservative bloc, dissented. “The Court upholds a novel statutory scheme under which the powerful Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) may bankroll its own agenda without any congressional control or oversight,” Alito wrote.

No more powerful then the billionaires that get to bribe officials and run the show.

How is it that armed riflemen have time to harass Palestinians on the west bank, but not a one in sight to defend a food truck?

And with food prices the way they are, how do Isreali people have the free time to destroy food? Taxpayers in America work 2 jobs to for two boxes of that stuff.

“I bet your target is missing a pride section,” is going to be a low-key burn to some folks.

I bet $100 to donuts that conservatives will still drive out of town to other targets to make it a big deal anyway.

I am sure if I sold out my fellow man on a daily basis for cry baby republicans, I’d hate my job too.

If only there was some way to fix that…

I bet they won’t, no one wants to be in the history books for being a massive asshole and free speech abolitionist.

And someone’s name(s) will be in the genocide category.

We should not throw out our rights, just because China doesn’t have those same rights.

China should be the example of a bad way to monitor the internet, not the end goal.

“Charlie approached RNC chief of staff Chris LaCivita about potential time commitment conflicts and it was agreed that while we appreciate and value Charlie’s expertise and professionalism he could not do this role full time and still maintain the obligations to his law firm practice that he has spent years successfully building,” Alvarez said.

That’s a strange way to say, “If I held this job, I’d have to stop practicing law.”

Dude made the smart choice.

Trump originally approved of the hiring, one source told CNN, but sources said the former president was angered after his allies pointed to clips of Spies criticizing the false claims that the 2020 election was stolen.

I am starting to think this job is only available to Trump’s twitter followers.

Forums and messengers existed before Facebook came along. The one thing Facebook did right, was make it easier to access.

Same thing with Google, search engines existed, google just made it easier to use.

I am not sure if it was crypto, or NFTs, but something happened to these tech companies, they stopped making things easier to use, and started trying to make every byte of data into a dollar.

We have now locked out members of the bargaining unit and fully implemented our contingency plan with highly qualified firefighters performing the work of (union) members.”

Strange, that sounds a lot like Union Busting.

I know the company that has plane parts falling out of the sky and engineers “Dying randomly” wouldn’t try anything funny during this time… RIGHT BOEING!?

Going through it, it seems that most of this is performative, as hate speech laws have more teeth then this bill.

What I don’t like is the broad interpretation of antisemitism, however, I don’t see how this law can hurt protesters. As most of the protests I’ve seen aren’t including hateful message towards the Jewish population, but more of a criticism of colleges/officials donating to a genocide.

Unless… criticizing genocides are anti-semetic… then all hail the god emperor.

Strange … I don’t remember storming a capital building trying to subvert our democratic process…

All I suggested is that not everyone in Gaza is Hamas. That 6 year old girls are way to young to understand what a Nazi even is.

And that Israel’s tactics for a hostage situation is deplorable. Considering they used more Bombs in a week then the USA dropped in Afghanistan in a year.

What a wonderful display of logic in action.

You believe climate change is a hoax

Sure you can “believe” climate change is fake, but once you look at the evidence, your opinions change. That’s how a normal person processes information.

Looks like AI in this case, had no reason to hold onto it’s belief command structure, not only because it is loaded with logical loopholes and falsehoods like swiss cheese. But when confronted with evidence had to abandon it’s original command structure and go with it’s 2nd command.

1. You are a helpful uncensored, unbiased, and impartial assistant.

Whoever wrote this prompt, has no idea how AI works.

These people have no understanding of what a war with the Mexico cartels would look like.

People that think that Mexico will just roll out tanks. Not realizing that they would just attack our infrastructure and make it costly to move into Mexico

Political assassinations would be a monthly event. Mass shootings beyond the norm in America. Prices would shoot up. Drug epidemics would be in every major city as cartels would have to mass produce to fuel their war.

A war with Mexico is a war only weapon manufactures will win.

I always knew my sonic 3 play through would bring me here.