This is actually pretty accurate. Not sure why you got to down vote.

I read this article and another one that someone linked in the comments and it really didn’t say anything at all.

I’ll be up front and say that I have very serious problems with camps like this in general. However, the accusations seem serious and it would have been helpful if the article actually detailed them. Instead it said:

As of Tuesday, officials had not released details about why they believe the children may have been in danger, how old they were, why they were at the Bible study camp, or if anyone was arrested.

The article itself had hyperlinks to what seemed to be unrelated abusers. I’m just more confused.

What happened? Were children harmed? Will the abusers, if they exist, be held to justice?

Again, I have serious issues with programs like these in general. I might argue that abuse is indeed happening, but not in the way this article implies. unfortunately, the abuse that I believe is certainly happening is not kind of thing that would prevail in court in a country that doesn’t seem to have a legal problem with things like conversion therapy.

Curious. What is a face shield?

WHAT??? WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT?!

It’s funny those potato chips are mentioned in that article because I only tried them a couple weeks ago and I desperately want them again. 😁

Would love to see that list of items.

Convenient how people ignore those parts…

Way to publicize your bigotry, hypocrisy, and brokenness. I can’t wait for the day where people rise above this behavior.

But of course, anyone reading the gospels can totally see that this is precisely how Jesus would act. Right? Right? 🙄

Good read. Incredible woman, postpartum or not. And the fact that breastfeeding requires 300 to 500 calories a day, she was burning much needed calories during her race to keep producing. 🥇

🫩

Oh no.

But being accurate with the headline makes it less click baity. 😏 Honestly, this article is scant on details.

Data centers don’t usually have an “X-ray polarization detector for picking up brief cosmic phenomena.” Like you said, it seems more like a scientific tool than an actual “data center.”

They’ve certainly had to come up with some way to effectively radiate the heat into space. The article doesn’t mention it though. i presume it’s one of the main reasons for networking so many machines together?

12 of 2800 planned have been launched.

I want to believe you’re wrong, but… I can’t. 😔

Honestly, they’re not.

I hate to say it, but the system needs to crash and burn for people to wake up. I need and want to avoid that at all costs, but some people… most people… don’t seem to be able to learn without it.

I think you are overestimating just how much constituents are invested in what their politicians actually do…

Many many many persons feel the side effects, the burn, of their elected politicians deviating from what they hoped. And yet each election cycle, these politicians continue to be voted in.

I mean, they get mad, but mad enough to watch C-Span and make calls…? 😅

As you can see, Trump is saving the United States.

😏

Edit: adding the /s tag because of the downvotes. smh.

I understand the issue. It’s clear. What I don’t understand is this article focusing on Ocasio-Cortez’s “by the light of day” comment.

Are people watching these proceedings live on C-Span with their hand on the phone ready to call their congressperson’s office? If Republicans pushed this through “during the light of day,” would it make any actual difference? Why can’t congresspersons challenge this in the middle of the night? Does Ocasio-Cortez think Republican constituents will be making those calls to change the minds of their politicians? 🤔

Oh no.