https://donate.ed.ac.uk/support/ME-CFSResearch

Alts: FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone FundMECFS@quokk.au

  • 1 Post
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 19th, 2024

help-circle



  • Edit: Are you from the US? Because sometimes in the US they refer to “social liberalism” as liberalism. If so then the arguments you are trying to make make far more sense. Vis à vis social liberalism. From Wikipedia

    In Europe and North America, the establishment of social liberalism(often called simply liberalism in the United States)

    Previous comment: Oh my god. No it isn’t. Liberalism is a political philsophy based on enlightenment ideals.

    Like Locke’s social contract theory, hence the idea (that often fails in practice) of “consent of the governed”.

    Liberalism did give us the declaration of human rights. It also gave us capitalism. It’s a complex ideology that has been dominant in the west for the past couple centuries. It is not synonymous with “Human rights”, and it is not the only ideology that claims to promote them.

    Plenty of anti-capitalist ideologies arguably promote them more.

    And famous liberals throughout history have been slave owners. So please please learn nuance.








  • A mouse model still is really not a stage to post news articles. Only 1 in ~100+ drugs that make it past mouse models eventually get approved. And those are replicated findings. As far as I can tell this headline is an un replicated study.

    Journalists need clickbait “cancer cure” hopium. But I don’t think it’s very useful. As a chronically ill person myself I’m sick of people sending me those articles about my illness because they think a cure’s on the horizon when well, it’s really unlikely. Which means every time they see me and I’m not magically cured I have to sit through another “what about that miracle drug” convo. I still hope, but I don’t like the misleading hopium journalism seems to love.