Finally I can check for myself!

…YES I’M ON THE LIST

I don’t even publically say that much ““radical left”” stuff on here

Pee is stored in the nipples(?)

Interesting. I can confirm that using mobile Chrome I can see the video when I go into the post, but not from the front page preview.

Frontend issue-- on the web client I see them

Jersey jersey = new Jersey();

Team rock, sticks are awkward to keep around long-term but rocks can sit on my desk indefinitely

I nipped this in the bud in my server by just making ONE #hobbies channel. What if two people want to talk about their specific subject at the same time? Figure it out lmao or make a thread I guess

Hmm, fair

Yup

Isn’t it technically that he has already paid, and the escrow account must now transfer the money to her?

It’s like carcinization, all robot vacuum names eventually become “voov”

Isn’t the repo basically blank…?

No, it’s the part of the Fediverse that uses this thread-based format

“Here is a beautiful piece of art. You say it’s just a blank piece of paper? Please feel free to draw your own art on it, and then it will be as I said.”

I know the real news here is the hardware, but it is still funny…

Sucky Unsupervised Cleaning Knickknack

Meta tried very hard but their ideas of how VR/AR will be used are very misguided. I guess it could be used as a social media, but it’s really much more well-suited to games and especially tools, the latter of which is quite underexplored.

Entirely agreed on blockchain. The technology itself does have uses, but for the most part it doesn’t improve on having a centralized trusted source. For situations where that + a method for recovering from the loss of that source is not sufficient, blockchain can offer advantages, although its adoption still suffers from the network effect like anything else does. Cryptocurrency is valid, NFTs have theoretically valid uses but have never actually been used for them, and crypto stocks are, as with any stock, just gambling.

Yeah, choosing to establish the semver social contract and then break it is not great

I don’t think it’s valid to simultaneously present open-source as a legitimate alternative for paid software, while also saying you can’t have expectations of the software or trust its guarantees (ie. semver) because it’s just a volunteer project. If you’re presenting your OSS in the serious space of choices for its niche, it will (and should be!) held to a high standard. If it can’t be, then don’t present it as a real alternative. I’ve noticed this (mostly-unintentional) conflation between serious OSS competitors and hobby projects in almost every discussion on this topic I’ve seen.

Them admitting this is possible should already concern people.

The second issue was too blatant, I knew I was getting the old 4chan bait and switch