Neat. Great response. No notes, you’ve made my point.

Ah yes, I did mess that up, “shitty video app”, sorry. The conglomerate of Lemmy is all starting to sound the same 🤣. Now, I would still say is a vitriol response to people losing their right to assemble and freedom of speech, along with many people’s form of income. It’s at the very least callous and lacks empathy.

As for the arsonist portion: “jumping to an arsonist’s defense” - You 🥴 Also notice how you mentioned it again, in the next follow up. That’s called rhetoric and your intention is clear. Cool? Cool.

A bubble is where a singular set of viewpoints are dominant and reinforced by the in-group while any outside perspectives are removed or written off with some in-group jargon. I would say this community fits that quite well actually.

Where, in the fuck, did I defend the arsonist in my response? Your response however, did say that banning an app isn’t fucking over thousands and also called it a “silly dance app”. So again, vitriolic and reductive by calling it a silly dance app and concluding that OP should be the one to gain perspective, when you are only looking through your own.

I stand by what I said, and again, this sentiment seems rampant on Lemmy. Which is why I said this is a bubble. See? No assumptions, just reading comprehension.

Hope this helps 👌

I’m pretty new here but this seems like a Lemmy bubble take from what I’ve seen so far. An L take at that. Just because you were told it’s just a silly dance app, doesn’t make it true. The flow of information there is wild and it serves as a great source of 1st account world news and a great place for small and start up businesses to gain footing in the market. You are being overly reductive and I can’t figure out WHERE the vitriol is coming from.