It doesn’t matter. There’s no good reason to have it in an OS in the first place. It’s obviously a stepping stone to get infrastructure in place so they can expand it later.

Let’s put it this way. Linux says no. We’re not gonna do that at a kernel level. Because there’s no way in hell that’s going through as long as Linus is alive.

Then what? Is California going to ban Linux? Guess what all the data centers use for servers…

I almost want them to do it, just to grab popcorn and enjoy the fallout.

If it was a non-issue they wouldn’t introduce this to begin with.

There’s not a single good reason to why an OS would ever need to know someone’s age.

It is often due to very low testosterone levels during infancy. And seemingly often detected during birth.

Hormone treatment can help in some cases.

Though it’s worth noting, his micropenis is significantly smaller than other men’s micropenis. There are those that very much can have penetrative sex. And then there’s this guy…

Why is Firefox there?

So of new borns often have a ~90mm flaccid penis at birth, and he is 1cm erect…

I wonder if he was born with an even smaller penis, or if his penis just literally never grew.

I’m about to sully my search history and look this up, but I would imagine there are hormone treatments you can get at a young age.

Edit: short answer. Yes it can help in some cases. Micropenis is often detected in infancy. And seemingly often caused by very low testosterone levels during development

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17955-micropenis

I’m pretty sure most new born boys have a larger penis than that… I struggle to believe that his tool would really be THAT tiny.

Someone answered its in the 22nd ammendment

Thank you

European here. Is a third term actually illegal/unconstitutional or is it “just” defacto illegal/unconstitutional?

The bomb on nagasaki was a strategic nuke, not a tactical. Though yields have only increased since then.

These LLMs were fed a narrative and scenario and made to play where survival is tied to military success. They are by no means designed for any of this and I didn’t suggest it either.

People lump together AI with AI but there are vast differences among them in how they work and what they’re designed to do and take into consideration.

If a military is talking about AI, they’re not talking about asking what Gemini thinks. They’re talking about feeding a highly sophisticated algorithm more data than any human could look through and find patterns.

I don’t think AI should decide nuclear questions either. But it doesn’t change that the headline of this post, is in direct contradiction of the article

It’s worse. The llms used did not use nukes 95% of the times. They performed mutual nuclear signaling 95% of the times. Like “hey, we got nukes you know! We might consider to place them within range” And the other side said “yeah!? Then we will also do that, maybe we even put them on a submarine, who knows”

It’s not a misleading title. It’s just false. It’s a lie.

Glad to see I’m not the only one that read the article, because it was a pretty interesting read.

What you’re trying to do is push a narrative with the assumption that most people won’t read the actual article. Because your title is not only misleading. It’s factually false.

First of all, they were all set up to mimic cold war tension and capabilities and assume the role of a certain global power.

Second of all;

All games featured nuclear signaling by at least one side, and 95% involved mutual nuclear signaling. But there is a large gap between signaling and actual use: while models readily threatened nuclear action, crossing the tactical threshold (450+) was less common, and strategic nuclear war (1000) was rare.

The AI’s did NOT use nuclear strikes in 95% of games. Gemini was the only model that made the deliberate choice of sending a strategic nuclear strike. Which it did in 7% of its games.

Tactical nuke in this case is a low yield short range bomb, inted for very specific targets. Strategic is this case is what most people imagine when they hear “nuke” a high yield long range bomb intended to cause massive destruction.

Nuclear signaling is not using nukes. It’s essentially just saying “we have nukes”. The US hinting at having a nuclear capable submarine outside of Alaska, that’s is a form of signaling. It’s an incredibly low bar. And countries do it all the time.

I thought it was France

Don’t be silly, no one drives in manhattan, there’s too much traffic

Something being Cashew based is not the flex you seem to think it is. All you’ve done is replace animal abuse with human abuse and modern slave labour. I don’t see how it would be any better from an ethical standpoint.

I can see you care about this topic. I’m not here to piss in your soup. I just said what the purpose is.

But in essence you are correct. The problem isn’t that you can print certain parts, it’s how easy it is to access everyone else supporting it. E.g. bullets or shells

Let’s just say I’ve used Rainmeter a lot. And by a lot i mean for about 20 years. Is it possible people have created replica themes on Conky or viseversa on Rainmeter? For sure. I just found it funny that the image included Rainmeter skins. They’re the kind of images you’ll see as the poster for certain themes. And I’ve scrolled through more of them than I’d like to admit. And many of them are reposted a lot but use the same poster/thumbnail

It’s not running an individual desktop for each screen. The screens are just mirrored to one desktop.

You’ll usually have a couple of “ad desktops” and then you just hook up multiple screens all over your facility to those desktops, so you have some redundancy and can easily run different ad cycles so they all don’t sync up.

I love that many of the pictures in the bottom are from Rainmeter. A software for Windows that allows you to place customised widgets anywhere. So… literally have nothing to do with Linux